Project
Nuclear Futures
Navigating the future of nuclear innovation and competition

The nuclear sector is undergoing unprecedented transformation across both civilian and military domains. Stimson’s Nuclear Futures initiative convenes leading experts and practitioners to shed light on the sources, trajectories, and impacts of these dramatic developments – and to shape their evolution. Through pathbreaking research, analysis, and engagements, this effort explores the rapidly shifting global nuclear landscape, spanning regional crises and conflicts, challenges to global order, non-proliferation goals, and strategic assumptions. It also investigates how disruptive technologies, energy security imperatives, and nuclear governance paradigms are redefining the future of nuclear policy and practice. This effort builds on the legacy of the Stimson Center’s founders Michael Krepon and Barry Blechman, who devoted their lives to preventing the use of nuclear weapons in regional conflicts.

The Nuclear Futures Initiative focuses its work in three core areas:

  • Crises & Conflict. Flashpoints, deterrence dilemmas, and nuclear risk in volatile regions.
  • Strategy, Global Order, and Non-Proliferation. Nuclear doctrines, modernization debates, and arms control futures.
  • Technology, Energy & Nuclear Governance. Emerging tech, energy transitions, and governance regimes shaping nuclear security.
Crises & Conflict

Nuclear flashpoints around the world are under growing pressure. From the war in Ukraine to India–Pakistan tensions, the Korean Peninsula, and Iran’s advancing capabilities, the risk of nuclear use in conflict is both real and rising. Crises are unfolding faster and escalating further than ever before, driven by intensifying great-power rivalry, rapid military modernization, and emerging technologies. Strategies to manage and mitigate nuclear risk are under mounting strain as arms control frameworks fray and confidence-building measures fail to account for new forms of instability. As regional crises risk spiraling into global nuclear confrontation, there is an urgent need to understand these evolving sources of instability, encourage restraint, and invest in novel mechanisms for crisis management.

A closer look at how the US-Saudi nuclear deal could reshape enrichment, safeguards, commercial competition, and Middle East security.
Reflecting on lessons from the one-year anniversary of the May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis and learnings from other recent conflicts for South Asia.
Exploring Pakistan’s strategy for navigating a complex regional security environment and shifting paradigms in conventional conflicts and the global nuclear order.
Video interviews with experts on strategic and technical dimensions of air defense.
Exploring India’s nuclear posture and modernization efforts in a changing regional security environment with two nuclear-armed adversaries.
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty remains indispensable to preserving transparency, reinforcing restraint, and preventing a return to a global nuclear arms race.
Strategy, Global Order, and Non-Proliferation

Tensions among major powers, at their highest point in decades, threaten to reignite a new, three-way nuclear arms race among the United States, Russia, and China as they expand and modernize their arsenals. Meanwhile, uncertainty about U.S. commitment to the defense of long-standing strategic partners drives open deliberation about their seeking their own nuclear weapons. The international community’s failures to prevent North Korea’s nuclear weapons program or to establish transparency into Iran’s nuclear program further add to the forces eroding the decades-old “grand bargain” of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, opening the world to a new era of sharply increased nuclear risk.

Lack of transparency drives proliferation; only sustained, intrusive monitoring anchored in the Additional Protocol can expose, deter, and prevent Iran’s pursuit of
Taxpayers are now contending with the crashing “bow wave” of defense spending that started growing around the turn of the century while
Lawmakers are poised to set the Pentagon budget at more than $1 trillion in fiscal year 2027 – with almost a quarter
Defense bill would further weaken congressional control over defense spending.
American defense policymakers need to fundamentally reconsider the approach to military aviation.
This RevCon has taken place amid the ongoing Iran war, which is largely paused due to a tenuous, shaky ceasefire.
Technology, Energy & Nuclear Governance

The global nuclear industry is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by technological innovation, decarbonization, energy security, and geopolitical competition. Civilian demand for power is rising just as disruptions are affecting traditional nuclear fuel supply chains. Start-ups, Big Tech, and established firms alike are developing next-generation fission and fusion reactors, redefining what is possible for both newcomers and traditional nuclear states. At the same time, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and other innovations are reshaping every stage of the nuclear enterprise, from fuel cycle management and reactor design to safeguards, verification, and decision-making. These advances offer powerful tools for operational efficiency and strengthening nuclear security. This growing technological and industrial diversity brings risks of fragmented supply chains and uneven regulation but also presents an opportunity to rethink governance and cooperation towards building a more resilient, secure, sustainable nuclear future.

Preventing the proliferation of WMD remains as relevant today as in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, even as threat reduction evolves to
The nuclear security lessons of 9/11 remain critical as a fast-growing nuclear energy industry confronts new and unexpected risks. Nuclear forensics can
Planning for the future of the U.S. nuclear security workforce.

Introduction: A Nuclear Acceleration The current administration has launched an ambitious push to revitalize the U.S. nuclear power industry domestically with the

Attacks on Ukrainian and Russian nuclear facilities, new nuclear reactors and fuels in the U.S., and Anthropic’s efforts to identify nuclear weapons
Why intensifying protectionism could make it harder to enforce WMD nonproliferation regimes.