House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) has declared that a trillion-dollar-plus Pentagon budget is the “new normal.” But so far, lawmakers have had to sacrifice a core element of their constitutional authority: the ability to direct how federal dollars are spent.
Last year, Congress took the unprecedented step of approving a defense budget exceeding $1 trillion through the highly partisan budget reconciliation process rather than regular order appropriations, which require bipartisan consensus. In doing so, lawmakers dramatically expanded the Pentagon’s ability to move money from one account to another with minimal congressional guidance and oversight. This represents a significant concession of lawmakers’ constitutional power of the purse.
This dynamic is likely to continue in the coming fiscal year. To fulfill President Trump’s $1.5 trillion national security budget request, Congress will need to approve $1.1 trillion for the Pentagon’s base budget, $41.6 billion for nuclear weapons programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration, $11.9 billion for other defense activities, and an additional $350 billion for the Pentagon through reconciliation. But reconciliation isn’t the only instrument shifting control away from Congress and toward the executive branch.
Read the full piece on Forbes.
Originally posted in Forbes
Defense Policy & Posture, Defense Policy & Posture
House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) has declared that a trillion-dollar-plus Pentagon budget is the “new normal.” But so far, lawmakers have had to sacrifice a core element of their constitutional authority: the ability to direct how federal dollars are spent.
Last year, Congress took the unprecedented step of approving a defense budget exceeding $1 trillion through the highly partisan budget reconciliation process rather than regular order appropriations, which require bipartisan consensus. In doing so, lawmakers dramatically expanded the Pentagon’s ability to move money from one account to another with minimal congressional guidance and oversight. This represents a significant concession of lawmakers’ constitutional power of the purse.
This dynamic is likely to continue in the coming fiscal year. To fulfill President Trump’s $1.5 trillion national security budget request, Congress will need to approve $1.1 trillion for the Pentagon’s base budget, $41.6 billion for nuclear weapons programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration, $11.9 billion for other defense activities, and an additional $350 billion for the Pentagon through reconciliation. But reconciliation isn’t the only instrument shifting control away from Congress and toward the executive branch.
Read the full piece on Forbes.
Recent & Related
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Bombs, Bugs, and Bots: Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 25 Years After 9/11
The Shadow of 9/11 on Future US Foreign Policy
Can the Powers of the Post-9/11 Presidency Be Checked?
The Future of US Basing in the Gulf After the 2026 Iran War
The Continued Nuclear Security Legacy of 9/11
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.