House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) has declared that a trillion-dollar-plus Pentagon budget is the “new normal.” But so far, lawmakers have had to sacrifice a core element of their constitutional authority: the ability to direct how federal dollars are spent.
Last year, Congress took the unprecedented step of approving a defense budget exceeding $1 trillion through the highly partisan budget reconciliation process rather than regular order appropriations, which require bipartisan consensus. In doing so, lawmakers dramatically expanded the Pentagon’s ability to move money from one account to another with minimal congressional guidance and oversight. This represents a significant concession of lawmakers’ constitutional power of the purse.
This dynamic is likely to continue in the coming fiscal year. To fulfill President Trump’s $1.5 trillion national security budget request, Congress will need to approve $1.1 trillion for the Pentagon’s base budget, $41.6 billion for nuclear weapons programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration, $11.9 billion for other defense activities, and an additional $350 billion for the Pentagon through reconciliation. But reconciliation isn’t the only instrument shifting control away from Congress and toward the executive branch.
Read the full piece on Forbes.
Defense Policy & Posture, Defense Policy & Posture
Share:
Originally posted in Forbes
House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) has declared that a trillion-dollar-plus Pentagon budget is the “new normal.” But so far, lawmakers have had to sacrifice a core element of their constitutional authority: the ability to direct how federal dollars are spent.
Last year, Congress took the unprecedented step of approving a defense budget exceeding $1 trillion through the highly partisan budget reconciliation process rather than regular order appropriations, which require bipartisan consensus. In doing so, lawmakers dramatically expanded the Pentagon’s ability to move money from one account to another with minimal congressional guidance and oversight. This represents a significant concession of lawmakers’ constitutional power of the purse.
This dynamic is likely to continue in the coming fiscal year. To fulfill President Trump’s $1.5 trillion national security budget request, Congress will need to approve $1.1 trillion for the Pentagon’s base budget, $41.6 billion for nuclear weapons programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration, $11.9 billion for other defense activities, and an additional $350 billion for the Pentagon through reconciliation. But reconciliation isn’t the only instrument shifting control away from Congress and toward the executive branch.
Read the full piece on Forbes.
Recent & Related
Is Congress Losing Its Grip On The Nation’s Purse Strings?
What Would Militia Disarmament in Iraq Actually Mean and Can It Be Achieved?
The Silent Infrastructure of Survival in Iran
Renewing the UN’s Toolbox for Peace and Security
Is the Iran War Worth It?
Culture is Currency Between Trump and Xi
The Sino-Moroccan Green Partnership in the Shadow of the Iran War
The United Arab Emirates and Pakistan: Weaponizing Interdependence
Takeaways from the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting
Parallel Talks with Israel are Reshaping Syria-Lebanon Relations
The Arab Maghreb Union Didn’t Stall. It Collapsed.
The Iran War is a Big Issue Among Many at the 2026 NPT RevCon
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Violence Against Women and Girls
Implications of Chinese Influence Operations for South Korea and the US-ROK Alliance
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.