Reference Library for the Mekong Infrastructure Tracker

Resources demonstrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) best practices, approaches, and case studies

  • May 25, 2020
  • 3:40 pm

This reference library hosts a limited set of documents that demonstrate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) best practices, approaches, and case studies. There are also examples of relevant governmental laws and regulations and international ESG frameworks that address risks and impacts to people and the environment. This library is not comprehensive but provides useful context in considering the data and analysis available through the Mekong Infrastructure Tracker. Documents are drawn from the countries of the Mekong, but case studies are also drawn from relevant global projects. Most documents are largely organized in terms of the mitigation hierarchy, methods and practices that help safeguard infrastructure development by avoiding, mitigating, or offsetting negative impacts.

Key to Library Sections:

Avoid. In this section, you will find information on approaches which identify risks early on in the development process and aim to avoid them entirely through strategic project placement or design. These approaches require early consideration but are also the most effective at managing project impacts. Documents in this section include guidelines and case studies for Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs), Cumulative Impact Assessments (CIAs), and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs); as well as system-scale planning approaches which can be applied early on in the project design process.

Mitigate. If impacts from a project cannot be avoided, project planners can explore options to minimize or reduce the impacts of the project. This can be done through the adoption of different technologies or operational methods or change in project scale, often identified through technical review processes for individual projects. In this section, you will find case studies on environmental mitigation such as fish passages and biodiversity corridors; conservation zones; and resettlement programs.

Offset. If it is impossible to avoid or mitigate impacts, then project planners can manage impacts through the restoration of damaged environments or through supporting offsets which aim to balance the negative impacts of the project. This is often done through providing protection for similar ecosystems elsewhere, supporting local, national, or regional environmental efforts, or specific restoration efforts. However, restoration efforts and other offsets are often more expensive and require more intensive labor than avoiding or mitigating impacts in the first place. Documents in this section explore practices such as payment for ecosystem services; biodiversity offsets and restoration efforts; and case studies from large projects. 


Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Southeast Asia
Choose Your Subscription Topics
* indicates required
I'm interested in...
38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea
South Asian Voices