By Ellen Laipson and Rob Havers:
As Tunisia approaches its presidential election later this month, it’s important to take the long view on the changes that began with the Tunisian revolt in late 2010. In an earlier, more optimistic moment, many believed that a transformation toward a more open, inclusive and prosperous region was underway. Now as a new government is elected, there is a real opportunity to push for meaningful reforms that could stimulate economic growth and job creation. Whatever the outcome of the election, the new president would do well to draw upon the lessons of one of recent history’s big ideas — the Marshall Plan — to inform the building of a strong and durable state.
Perhaps surprisingly, the big ideas of the Marshall Plan of a half century ago continue to resonate in parts of the Arab world, although what these ideas mean to individuals can vary considerably. Pro-Western elites may still hope that large infusions of capital will help calm the turbulence in resource-poor, young countries. But the real meaning of the Marshall Plan is about changing the relationship between the private sector and the state. That work has to be done at home, creating more favorable legal and regulatory environments for entrepreneurship, reforming higher education to provide more useful skills to the marketplace, and dismantling the state-centered enterprises that are inefficient and risk averse.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: travelbigo via flickr
Middle East, North Africa
By Ellen Laipson and Rob Havers:
As Tunisia approaches its presidential election later this month, it’s important to take the long view on the changes that began with the Tunisian revolt in late 2010. In an earlier, more optimistic moment, many believed that a transformation toward a more open, inclusive and prosperous region was underway. Now as a new government is elected, there is a real opportunity to push for meaningful reforms that could stimulate economic growth and job creation. Whatever the outcome of the election, the new president would do well to draw upon the lessons of one of recent history’s big ideas — the Marshall Plan — to inform the building of a strong and durable state.
Perhaps surprisingly, the big ideas of the Marshall Plan of a half century ago continue to resonate in parts of the Arab world, although what these ideas mean to individuals can vary considerably. Pro-Western elites may still hope that large infusions of capital will help calm the turbulence in resource-poor, young countries. But the real meaning of the Marshall Plan is about changing the relationship between the private sector and the state. That work has to be done at home, creating more favorable legal and regulatory environments for entrepreneurship, reforming higher education to provide more useful skills to the marketplace, and dismantling the state-centered enterprises that are inefficient and risk averse.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: travelbigo via flickr
Recent & Related
Intergenerational Solidarity and Learning in an Era of Declining Trust
The UN Annually Votes on Ending the US Embargo on Cuba. What Does it Mean for Unilateral Sanctions and Their Impact on Human Rights?
Experts React: The Midterms and America’s Place in the World
The Lame-Duck Period is Full of Peril in the War on Iran
Is Reforming the UNSC Realistic? Article 27(3) of the UN Charter Offers a Starting Point.
Beyond the Populist Zeitgeist
A New Transatlantic Equilibrium
Forging a European Foreign Policy
A Superpower in Decline
What Is Going on in Cybersecurity?
The Implications of Ukraine’s Starshield Access for the US Military
Egypt’s Parallel Inc. & the Myth of Sovereign Efficiency
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.