In June 2018, President Xi Jinping spoke at the CCP Central Work Conference on Foreign Affairs, where he stated that the world is currently experiencing a “once-in-a-century great change” (百年未有之大变局). Following this speech, the concept quickly became a prominent dictum in contemporary PRC foreign policy propaganda. This “great change” is understood to refer to the shift from the current US-dominated international system to a more multipolar system that better accommodates China and other developing nations. It is in part driven by a period of instability, launched with the 2008 financial crisis and now exacerbated by the pandemic, which in Xi’s words has “brought the world into a phase of fluidity and transformation”. Although this trend has not yet displaced the US from its hegemonic status, it provides an important strategic opportunity to China and creates favourable conditions for China’s national rejuvenation.
PRC policymakers and scholars view the construction of a stronger domestic and international legal apparatus as critical to taking advantage of these geopolitical trends. Last November, the CCP officially established “Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law”, which is meant to guide and promote law-based governance in China. While a significant component of the guidelines for “Xi Jinping Thought” is inward-facing, it has important implications for China’s foreign affairs. In a recent essay, Politburo member Wang Chen wrote that amidst the “great changes”, China must improve upon the “many shortcomings and weaknesses” of its international legal apparatus and strengthen mechanisms to “effectively respond to challenges and prevent risks”. In the People’s Daily last month, the Dean of Renmin University’s School of Law argued that China must enhance its ability through international law to formulate rules, set the policy agenda, and shape public opinion.
Read the full article in 9DASHLINE.
This article was originally published in 9DASHLINE.
China, Defense Policy & Posture, Defense Policy & Posture
In June 2018, President Xi Jinping spoke at the CCP Central Work Conference on Foreign Affairs, where he stated that the world is currently experiencing a “once-in-a-century great change” (百年未有之大变局). Following this speech, the concept quickly became a prominent dictum in contemporary PRC foreign policy propaganda. This “great change” is understood to refer to the shift from the current US-dominated international system to a more multipolar system that better accommodates China and other developing nations. It is in part driven by a period of instability, launched with the 2008 financial crisis and now exacerbated by the pandemic, which in Xi’s words has “brought the world into a phase of fluidity and transformation”. Although this trend has not yet displaced the US from its hegemonic status, it provides an important strategic opportunity to China and creates favourable conditions for China’s national rejuvenation.
PRC policymakers and scholars view the construction of a stronger domestic and international legal apparatus as critical to taking advantage of these geopolitical trends. Last November, the CCP officially established “Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law”, which is meant to guide and promote law-based governance in China. While a significant component of the guidelines for “Xi Jinping Thought” is inward-facing, it has important implications for China’s foreign affairs. In a recent essay, Politburo member Wang Chen wrote that amidst the “great changes”, China must improve upon the “many shortcomings and weaknesses” of its international legal apparatus and strengthen mechanisms to “effectively respond to challenges and prevent risks”. In the People’s Daily last month, the Dean of Renmin University’s School of Law argued that China must enhance its ability through international law to formulate rules, set the policy agenda, and shape public opinion.
Read the full article in 9DASHLINE.
Recent & Related
Intergenerational Solidarity and Learning in an Era of Declining Trust
The UN Annually Votes on Ending the US Embargo on Cuba. What Does it Mean for Unilateral Sanctions and Their Impact on Human Rights?
Experts React: The Midterms and America’s Place in the World
The Lame-Duck Period is Full of Peril in the War on Iran
Is Reforming the UNSC Realistic? Article 27(3) of the UN Charter Offers a Starting Point.
Beyond the Populist Zeitgeist
A New Transatlantic Equilibrium
Forging a European Foreign Policy
A Superpower in Decline
What Is Going on in Cybersecurity?
The Implications of Ukraine’s Starshield Access for the US Military
Egypt’s Parallel Inc. & the Myth of Sovereign Efficiency
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.