In July 2019, Pakistan started its macroeconomic adjustments under the IMF bailout program of USD $6 billion over three years to tackle its twin (current account and fiscal) deficit problem. In the past year, strict austerity measures attached to the IMF bailout package have contributed to contractions in the manufacturing industry, increasing unemployment, and inflation rising into the double digits. The spread of coronavirus has further delayed the recovery prospects of an ailing economy and emphasized gaps in the country’s health sector. In these challenging times instead of prioritizing government spending on the health sector and providing economic relief, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government’s recently released budget has set ambitious revenue targets and made cuts in the government expenditure to comply with the IMF’s austerity measures, which is likely to do little to alleviate economic pressures for the majority of Pakistan’s population.
The Economic Impact of the IMF Bailout
The severe austerity measures such as heavy taxation, rupee devaluation, and reduced government expenditure taken under the IMF program have helped reduce Pakistan’s current account and fiscal deficit but at a heavy cost of diminished economic growth. From July 2019 to March 2020, Pakistan’s current account deficit decreased by 73 percent to USD $2.8 billion, however this was mainly due to the massive depreciation of the rupee which led to a fall in import demand and a meager increase in exports—reducing the trade deficit by 31 percent. As expected, however, the GDP growth rate was projected at 2.4 percent for 2020 even before COVID-19 hit the country. Although in February 2020, Pakistan’s exports had shown a 3.6 percent growth when compared to the previous year, this sharply declined after COVID-19. Although the fiscal deficit fell from 5 percent to 3.8 percent of the GDP from July 2019 to March 2020, the government failed to meet the revenue targets for the fiscal year 2020 and public debt has increased to 88 percent of GDP.
Read the full article in South Asian Voices.
South Asia
Share:
This article was originally published in South Asian Voices.
In July 2019, Pakistan started its macroeconomic adjustments under the IMF bailout program of USD $6 billion over three years to tackle its twin (current account and fiscal) deficit problem. In the past year, strict austerity measures attached to the IMF bailout package have contributed to contractions in the manufacturing industry, increasing unemployment, and inflation rising into the double digits. The spread of coronavirus has further delayed the recovery prospects of an ailing economy and emphasized gaps in the country’s health sector. In these challenging times instead of prioritizing government spending on the health sector and providing economic relief, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government’s recently released budget has set ambitious revenue targets and made cuts in the government expenditure to comply with the IMF’s austerity measures, which is likely to do little to alleviate economic pressures for the majority of Pakistan’s population.
The Economic Impact of the IMF Bailout
The severe austerity measures such as heavy taxation, rupee devaluation, and reduced government expenditure taken under the IMF program have helped reduce Pakistan’s current account and fiscal deficit but at a heavy cost of diminished economic growth. From July 2019 to March 2020, Pakistan’s current account deficit decreased by 73 percent to USD $2.8 billion, however this was mainly due to the massive depreciation of the rupee which led to a fall in import demand and a meager increase in exports—reducing the trade deficit by 31 percent. As expected, however, the GDP growth rate was projected at 2.4 percent for 2020 even before COVID-19 hit the country. Although in February 2020, Pakistan’s exports had shown a 3.6 percent growth when compared to the previous year, this sharply declined after COVID-19. Although the fiscal deficit fell from 5 percent to 3.8 percent of the GDP from July 2019 to March 2020, the government failed to meet the revenue targets for the fiscal year 2020 and public debt has increased to 88 percent of GDP.
Read the full article in South Asian Voices.
Recent & Related
Bushehr, Barakah, and the Future of Nuclear Security in the Persian Gulf
Is Congress Losing Its Grip On The Nation’s Purse Strings?
What Would Militia Disarmament in Iraq Actually Mean and Can It Be Achieved?
The Silent Infrastructure of Survival in Iran
Renewing the UN’s Toolbox for Peace and Security
Is the Iran War Worth It?
Culture is Currency Between Trump and Xi
The Sino-Moroccan Green Partnership in the Shadow of the Iran War
The United Arab Emirates and Pakistan: Weaponizing Interdependence
Takeaways from the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting
Parallel Talks with Israel are Reshaping Syria-Lebanon Relations
The Arab Maghreb Union Didn’t Stall. It Collapsed.
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Violence Against Women and Girls
Implications of Chinese Influence Operations for South Korea and the US-ROK Alliance
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.