On March 1, Ambassador Don Mahley, the formidable State department nonproliferation negotiator, passed away at his home in Vienna, VA. Don, who had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in February 2012, served as the chief US negotiator on the ATT.
I first met Don, a retired Army colonel, in February 2008 on the second day of the first session of the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on the Arms Trade Treaty, where I was serving as the UN consultant. The United States was not originally persuaded of the need for a treaty and did not decide to participate in the GGE until the meeting had already begun. Don had the unenviable task of navigating the complex US domestic political landscape as well as a challenging United Nations negotiating process.
Over the next 5 years I watched as Don expertly led the US negotiating team throughout the UN’s ATT process. He traversed the difficult terrain of the United Nations all the while working within the bureaucratic morass of the US government. He instilled confidence in both skeptics of the Treaty as well as its most ardent supporters. In a mere six years, Don turned the United States from a Treaty opponent into a Treaty signatory.
Don was born in Peru, Indiana and attended my hometown college, Purdue University. Our shared Hoosier upbringing and a common love of theater allowed us to pass the stressful and often late night monotony of UN negotiations with good cheer and camaraderie. I fondly remember when we individually attended a showing of Broadway’s Macbeth starring Patrick Stewart, thinking we had each escaped the pressures of the negotiations for one night, only to find that we were inadvertently sharing the experience together.
Don was diagnosed with cancer in the final stages of the UN’s negotiations. But Don didn’t let his illness stop his commitment to seeing the Treaty through. Though he was not able to attend every meeting, his spirit and presence were obvious. The US delegation wanted to see the adoption of a Treaty Don could be proud of.
I visited Don at home a few weeks before he passed. Don used our time together to share his impressions of the ATT negotiations, how they differed from the Biological Weapons Convention process, and what lessons we should learn from the ATT negotiations for future multilateral efforts. I left Don’s house that day knowing I had been incredibly fortunate to have worked with and gotten to really know an amazing man.
Don will be missed terribly by his family and friends, and by his colleagues in the US government and around the world. The impression he left on numerous international agreements has been immense. I was fortunate to get a chance to watch him in action. Don had a common sense approach, always looking for the most pragmatic and least offensive solution to the difficult issues he faced. In the words of Macbeth, “Come what come may, time and the hour runs through the roughest day.”
Photo credit: Hilary Schwab via hschwabphotography.com
Human Security & Governance, Human Security & Governance
Share:
On March 1, Ambassador Don Mahley, the formidable State department nonproliferation negotiator, passed away at his home in Vienna, VA. Don, who had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in February 2012, served as the chief US negotiator on the ATT.
I first met Don, a retired Army colonel, in February 2008 on the second day of the first session of the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on the Arms Trade Treaty, where I was serving as the UN consultant. The United States was not originally persuaded of the need for a treaty and did not decide to participate in the GGE until the meeting had already begun. Don had the unenviable task of navigating the complex US domestic political landscape as well as a challenging United Nations negotiating process.
Over the next 5 years I watched as Don expertly led the US negotiating team throughout the UN’s ATT process. He traversed the difficult terrain of the United Nations all the while working within the bureaucratic morass of the US government. He instilled confidence in both skeptics of the Treaty as well as its most ardent supporters. In a mere six years, Don turned the United States from a Treaty opponent into a Treaty signatory.
Don was born in Peru, Indiana and attended my hometown college, Purdue University. Our shared Hoosier upbringing and a common love of theater allowed us to pass the stressful and often late night monotony of UN negotiations with good cheer and camaraderie. I fondly remember when we individually attended a showing of Broadway’s Macbeth starring Patrick Stewart, thinking we had each escaped the pressures of the negotiations for one night, only to find that we were inadvertently sharing the experience together.
Don was diagnosed with cancer in the final stages of the UN’s negotiations. But Don didn’t let his illness stop his commitment to seeing the Treaty through. Though he was not able to attend every meeting, his spirit and presence were obvious. The US delegation wanted to see the adoption of a Treaty Don could be proud of.
I visited Don at home a few weeks before he passed. Don used our time together to share his impressions of the ATT negotiations, how they differed from the Biological Weapons Convention process, and what lessons we should learn from the ATT negotiations for future multilateral efforts. I left Don’s house that day knowing I had been incredibly fortunate to have worked with and gotten to really know an amazing man.
Don will be missed terribly by his family and friends, and by his colleagues in the US government and around the world. The impression he left on numerous international agreements has been immense. I was fortunate to get a chance to watch him in action. Don had a common sense approach, always looking for the most pragmatic and least offensive solution to the difficult issues he faced. In the words of Macbeth, “Come what come may, time and the hour runs through the roughest day.”
Photo credit: Hilary Schwab via hschwabphotography.com
Recent & Related
What Would Militia Disarmament in Iraq Actually Mean and Can It Be Achieved?
The Silent Infrastructure of Survival in Iran
Renewing the UN’s Toolbox for Peace and Security
Is the Iran War Worth It?
Culture is Currency Between Trump and Xi
The Sino-Moroccan Green Partnership in the Shadow of the Iran War
The United Arab Emirates and Pakistan: Weaponizing Interdependence
Takeaways from the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting
Parallel Talks with Israel are Reshaping Syria-Lebanon Relations
The Arab Maghreb Union Didn’t Stall. It Collapsed.
The Iran War is a Big Issue Among Many at the 2026 NPT RevCon
What the Red Sea Conflict Between the U.S. and the Houthis Taught Iran
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Violence Against Women and Girls
Implications of Chinese Influence Operations for South Korea and the US-ROK Alliance
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.