Research
Menu
COVID-19 Notice: To protect the health of our team and our community, Stimson Center staff are working remotely. The Stimson office is closed to all visitors. All public events are now online. Staff remain available via email, phone, and video conference. During this time, the Stimson Center will continue its important work, informing policymakers and the public — here, on social media, and via email.
THE STIMSON CENTER
Engaging new voices, generating innovative ideas and analysis, and building solutions to promote international security, prosperity, and justice.
Engaging new voices, generating innovative ideas and analysis, and building solutions to promote international security, prosperity, and justice.
Copyright The Henry L. Stimson Center
Ties That Bind
From Afghanistan to Mali to Iraq, training and equipping other countries’ militaries has a terrible track record. Why would we want to make it a permanent part of U.S. strategy?
This is an urgent memo to the Senate and House Armed Services Committees: Making Section 1206, a DoD program that trains and equips militaries around the world, a part of permanent law is a bad idea. Stop now, before it is too late.
You’ll see what this is and why it is important in a minute. But first: This column is not about the bombing of the Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and Syria. I have my doubts about the effectiveness and the long-term consequences of the Obama effort to “ultimately destroy” IS. Thirteen years of U.S. military operations, including the training and arming of indigenous forces in Afghanistan did not eliminate the Taliban. And, clearly, 10 years of training and equipping forces in Iraq failed; they ran for it as soon as IS moved in.