By Lt. Col. Jeff Schreiner:
With nuclear technology the adage that “you can’t put the genie back in the bottle” is widely used. What if we are standing at the threshold of a technology that we could keep in the bottle before it runs amok in the international system? The recent failure of the U.S. Advanced Hypersonic Weapon test on the heels of an unsuccessful Chinese test of their WU-14 vehicle provides the world a chance to reflect on this technology and its possible strategic implications.
For those new to the debate, hypersonic weapons are essentially designed as either a super-fast cruise missile, like the United States’ X-51 Waverider test program, or a “boost-glide” platform, used on the two recent test failures. Speeds ranging from Mach 5 to Mach 10, roughly 4,000 to 8,000 mph, are considered consistent with hypersonic designation. This nascent technology is being designed for weaponization. Currently Russia, China, the U.S. and India all have hypersonic vehicles in various stages of development. The United States should carefully consider whether the tactical value is worth the strategic risks, especially once it’s married to nuclear weapons.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: Official U.S. Air Force via Flickr
Conventional Arms
By Lt. Col. Jeff Schreiner:
With nuclear technology the adage that “you can’t put the genie back in the bottle” is widely used. What if we are standing at the threshold of a technology that we could keep in the bottle before it runs amok in the international system? The recent failure of the U.S. Advanced Hypersonic Weapon test on the heels of an unsuccessful Chinese test of their WU-14 vehicle provides the world a chance to reflect on this technology and its possible strategic implications.
For those new to the debate, hypersonic weapons are essentially designed as either a super-fast cruise missile, like the United States’ X-51 Waverider test program, or a “boost-glide” platform, used on the two recent test failures. Speeds ranging from Mach 5 to Mach 10, roughly 4,000 to 8,000 mph, are considered consistent with hypersonic designation. This nascent technology is being designed for weaponization. Currently Russia, China, the U.S. and India all have hypersonic vehicles in various stages of development. The United States should carefully consider whether the tactical value is worth the strategic risks, especially once it’s married to nuclear weapons.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: Official U.S. Air Force via Flickr
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.