By Gordon Adams and Rebecca Williams – As the Arab world struggles to emerge from
oppressive, generations-old autocracies, America’s robust program to
train and equip foreign militaries has become a focus of attention. The
impact of US security assistance to the region is ambiguous, at best.
Providing military equipment and training has helped keep autocrats in
power but may have also provided us with a vital communication link to
the Egyptian military as the crisis evolved in that country.
The Stimson Center’s Budgeting for Foreign Affairs and Defense program released a timely new report on security assistance. The
report argues that US security assistance programs are now at a turning
point, given the drawdown of US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and the
events in the Middle East, and that now is the time to reevaluate the
purposes of such assistance and the framework which has defined them for
the past six decades.
A New Way Forward proposes that the expansion
of security assistance programs at DOD be reversed and that future
programs be focused in a broader goal of governance. The report provides
a list of guiding principles for rebalancing US security assistance
programs, recommendations for the executive and legislative branches,
and a transition strategy.
Comments about the report:
- “Our security assistance efforts need to be solidly embedded in our
foreign policy. State should have a lead role in that process and this
report provides one solid route for ensuring that leadership.”
Amb. Thomas Pickering, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs
- “At a time when fragile states around the world are increasingly
vulnerable to extremist and corrupt influences, Washington must find
less costly and more effective ways to promote international security. A New Way Forward calls
for a sensible realignment of security assistance programs that will go
a long way to converting precious assistance dollars into maximum
policy impact.”
Amb. Lincoln Bloomfield, Jr, former Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs
News articles about the report
Brannen, Kate. “Report: Return U.S. Security Assistance Role to State Dept.“, Defense News, 20 April 2011.
Bennett, John. “Think tank: “Shift foreign assistance programs, funds back to State“, The Hill, 24 April 2011.
Op-eds
Adams, Gordon and Rebecca Williams, “Civilians should lead security assistance with
longer-term focus“, The Will and the Wallet, 25 April 2011.
Grand Strategy
By Gordon Adams and Rebecca Williams – As the Arab world struggles to emerge from
oppressive, generations-old autocracies, America’s robust program to
train and equip foreign militaries has become a focus of attention. The
impact of US security assistance to the region is ambiguous, at best.
Providing military equipment and training has helped keep autocrats in
power but may have also provided us with a vital communication link to
the Egyptian military as the crisis evolved in that country.
The Stimson Center’s Budgeting for Foreign Affairs and Defense program released a timely new report on security assistance. The
report argues that US security assistance programs are now at a turning
point, given the drawdown of US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and the
events in the Middle East, and that now is the time to reevaluate the
purposes of such assistance and the framework which has defined them for
the past six decades.
A New Way Forward proposes that the expansion
of security assistance programs at DOD be reversed and that future
programs be focused in a broader goal of governance. The report provides
a list of guiding principles for rebalancing US security assistance
programs, recommendations for the executive and legislative branches,
and a transition strategy.
Comments about the report:
foreign policy. State should have a lead role in that process and this
report provides one solid route for ensuring that leadership.”
Amb. Thomas Pickering, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs
vulnerable to extremist and corrupt influences, Washington must find
less costly and more effective ways to promote international security. A New Way Forward calls
for a sensible realignment of security assistance programs that will go
a long way to converting precious assistance dollars into maximum
policy impact.”
Amb. Lincoln Bloomfield, Jr, former Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs
News articles about the report
Brannen, Kate. “Report: Return U.S. Security Assistance Role to State Dept.“, Defense News, 20 April 2011.
Bennett, John. “Think tank: “Shift foreign assistance programs, funds back to State“, The Hill, 24 April 2011.
Op-eds
Adams, Gordon and Rebecca Williams, “Civilians should lead security assistance with
longer-term focus“, The Will and the Wallet, 25 April 2011.
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.