In light of reporting today that President Obama has decided to seek a new United Nations Security Council resolution that would reaffirm objectives of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Stimson Center experts Laicie Heeley and Michael Krepon released the following statements:
“Much as he began, President Obama will end his term with a strong statement against nuclear weapons. This is likely to be a largely symbolic move, since an international norm against nuclear testing already exists. But it may encourage those countries who have not yet signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to take action, and that in and of itself would be a major accomplishment.” — Laicie Heeley, Fellow, Stimson Center
“Twenty years in limbo, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is in need of reaffirmation — and not just with the usual boilerplate of a U.N. General Assembly resolution. Kudos to the Obama administration. This resolution does not circumvent senatorial prerogatives. The Senate’s consent to ratification is still needed. But any initiative that helps raise the bar against testing — and helps penalize the one state that still tests — is worth taking.” — Michael Krepon, Co-founder, Stimson Center
Photo credit: IAEA via Flickr
In light of reporting today that President Obama has decided to seek a new United Nations Security Council resolution that would reaffirm objectives of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Stimson Center experts Laicie Heeley and Michael Krepon released the following statements:
“Much as he began, President Obama will end his term with a strong statement against nuclear weapons. This is likely to be a largely symbolic move, since an international norm against nuclear testing already exists. But it may encourage those countries who have not yet signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to take action, and that in and of itself would be a major accomplishment.” — Laicie Heeley, Fellow, Stimson Center
“Twenty years in limbo, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is in need of reaffirmation — and not just with the usual boilerplate of a U.N. General Assembly resolution. Kudos to the Obama administration. This resolution does not circumvent senatorial prerogatives. The Senate’s consent to ratification is still needed. But any initiative that helps raise the bar against testing — and helps penalize the one state that still tests — is worth taking.” — Michael Krepon, Co-founder, Stimson Center
Photo credit: IAEA via Flickr
Recent & Related
The UN Annually Votes on Ending the US Embargo on Cuba. What Does it Mean for Unilateral Sanctions and Their Impact on Human Rights?
Experts React: The Midterms and America’s Place in the World
The Lame-Duck Period is Full of Peril in the War on Iran
Is Reforming the UNSC Realistic? Article 27(3) of the UN Charter Offers a Starting Point.
Beyond the Populist Zeitgeist
A New Transatlantic Equilibrium
Forging a European Foreign Policy
A Superpower in Decline
What Is Going on in Cybersecurity?
The Implications of Ukraine’s Starshield Access for the US Military
Egypt’s Parallel Inc. & the Myth of Sovereign Efficiency
Four Years to 2030: Can Member States Deliver Affordable and Clean Energy for All?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.