The US-Israel strikes on Iran and the subsequent “Tanker War” have triggered a dual chokepoint crisis unparalleled in modern history. A simultaneous effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the probability of Houthi escalations around the Red Sea basin have severed the Mediterranean and North Africa from their primary Asian energy and industrial supply lines. Tehran’s retaliatory campaign has since triggered a systemic shock that is reverberating with unusual speed and intensity, as disruptions to energy flows and inevitable price shocks will alter the operating logic of entire economies. Moreover, governments must now confront a convergence of crises in which energy insecurity feeds food inflation, shipping paralysis distorts trade patterns, and political fragility is amplified by external shocks over which they will have little control.
The first conduit, as always, is energy markets, with oil prices crossing the $100–110 per barrel threshold, which creates a sharp divergence between exporters and importers in North Africa. Algeria and Libya will likely experience short-term fiscal windfalls that mask structural vulnerabilities. Increased revenues will offer breathing room yet also reduce the urgency of long-delayed reforms. Furthermore, rentier reflexes tend to reassert themselves under such conditions, reinforcing state-centric economic models that struggle to generate employment.
Meanwhile, Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco will face deteriorating balance-of-payments positions. Egypt’s external financing gap, for instance, which is already estimated at tens of billions of dollars annually, will widen further as fuel import bills surge. Tunisia’s precarious debt dynamics will grow more acute, raising the probability of further currency depreciation and subsidy cuts that worsen current pain.
Such divergences tend to carry geopolitical consequences. European demand will accelerate its shift toward North African gas suppliers as Gulf exports become unreliable over the long term. In turn, Algeria gains leverage in pricing and contract negotiations, but such leverage is transactional rather than transformative. European buyers remain wary, and infrastructure bottlenecks limit how far supply can scale. At the same time, Libya’s internal fragmentation constrains its ability to capitalize fully on favorable prices. Energy windfalls, therefore, risk entrenching uneven development rather than fostering regional stability.
Elsewhere, shipping disruptions compound these initial pressures. The Mediterranean Sea has effectively transformed from a global transit corridor into a “cul-de-sac” for Asian trade. Closure or effective disruption of both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea corridor will reconfigure global trade flows, and Mediterranean ports that depend on Asia–Europe transshipment are experiencing declining throughput. Port Said and Tangier Med, which together handle millions of containers annually, face reduced volumes as supply chains stall upstream.
Worse yet, freight rates for Asia–Mediterranean routes have spiked. Spot rates from Asia to the Mediterranean have spiked (up to $8,500/FEU), with carriers imposing emergency war surcharges. This acts as a direct tariff on North African economies reliant on imported intermediate goods, making such distortions extend beyond headline trade figures into industrial production across North Africa. Delays in electronics, machinery parts, and chemicals disrupt manufacturing cycles, particularly in Morocco’s automotive sector and Egypt’s industrial zones. Just-in-time production models break down under such conditions, forcing firms to either absorb higher inventory costs or curtail output. Smaller firms, lacking access to credit, face disproportionate risks of closure.
Further, threats to food security represent a far more insidious channel of impact. Fertilizer inputs linked to Gulf supply chains have become scarce and expensive, which will affect the 2026 agricultural season. Yield reductions of 20–30% are plausible in parts of the Sahel if input shortages persist. Such declines occur against a backdrop of already elevated food prices. In landlocked countries across much of the Sahel, transport costs account for a significant share of food prices. Rising diesel costs, therefore, translate directly into higher consumer prices, creating a feedback loop where energy inflation becomes food inflation.
Elsewhere, urban populations, particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, remain highly sensitive to bread prices. Subsidy systems and other safety nets, already strained, face renewed pressure. Governments confront a binary choice between fiscal stability and social stability. Cutting subsidies risks protests reminiscent of past unrest, while maintaining them accelerates debt accumulation. Neither option offers a sustainable equilibrium, which strains the region’s political economies. Governments that rely on implicit social contracts — subsidized goods in exchange for political acquiescence — will face mounting pressure as the fiscal space narrows.
Polarization within North Africa risks intensifying in parallel. Algeria’s alignment with anti-Western narratives contrasts with Morocco’s deepening security ties with Western partners and Israel. Such divergence risks hardening geopolitical fault lines. Already, arms imports into Morocco have increased significantly over recent years, and elevated threat perceptions could accelerate militarization on both sides.
Proxy dynamics in the Sahel and Horn of Africa will likely evolve. Iranian influence, while limited compared to other actors, has included security cooperation and arms transfers. Disruptions to Tehran’s capacity may reduce such flows, yet alternative suppliers stand ready to fill the gap. Russia and Türkiye already play dominant roles in regional arms markets. Reduced Iranian engagement does not necessarily translate into reduced militarization; it may simply shift the balance among external patrons.
Longer-term implications point toward a reordering of regional interdependence. Supply chains are likely to diversify, with greater emphasis on intra-African trade and alternative energy partnerships. However, such adjustments require time and investment. Immediate effects remain overwhelmingly negative for import-dependent economies. After all, the economic shocks of this magnitude tend to outlast the conflicts that trigger them. Reconstruction of supply chains, restoration of investor confidence, and stabilization of fiscal positions often take years. North Africa and the Sahel enter this period with limited buffers. Debt levels are high, foreign reserves are uneven, and institutional capacity varies widely.
A broader lesson emerges from the current crisis. Interconnected vulnerabilities have reached a point where disruptions in one region rapidly cascade across multiple domains. Energy, food, trade, and security are no longer separable policy arenas. Effective responses require integrated strategies that address these linkages rather than treating symptoms in isolation.
Absent such coordination, the region risks entering a cycle where external shocks repeatedly expose structural weaknesses and metastasize crises. War in the Gulf has once again revealed how deeply North Africa and the Sahel remain embedded in global systems over which they exert limited influence. Managing such exposure, rather than merely reacting to it, will better enhance the region’s resilience in an era of convergent crises, enduring volatility, and fragmenting global order.
Impacts of the Iran War on North Africa, the Sahel, and the Mediterranean
By Hafed Al Ghwell
Middle East & North Africa
War-driven disruptions in the Gulf are triggering a cascading shock across North Africa, the Sahel, and the Mediterranean, severing energy flows and distorting global trade routes. Oil price spikes, shipping disruptions, and supply chain breakdowns are feeding directly into fiscal strain, industrial slowdowns, and rising food insecurity—especially in import-dependent economies like Egypt and Tunisia. At the same time, energy exporters such as Algeria and Libya gain short-term windfalls that risk reinforcing structural imbalances rather than enabling reform. These overlapping pressures are deepening geopolitical fragmentation and exposing how tightly interconnected—and vulnerable—the region’s economic and political systems have become.
The US-Israel strikes on Iran and the subsequent “Tanker War” have triggered a dual chokepoint crisis unparalleled in modern history. A simultaneous effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the probability of Houthi escalations around the Red Sea basin have severed the Mediterranean and North Africa from their primary Asian energy and industrial supply lines. Tehran’s retaliatory campaign has since triggered a systemic shock that is reverberating with unusual speed and intensity, as disruptions to energy flows and inevitable price shocks will alter the operating logic of entire economies. Moreover, governments must now confront a convergence of crises in which energy insecurity feeds food inflation, shipping paralysis distorts trade patterns, and political fragility is amplified by external shocks over which they will have little control.
The first conduit, as always, is energy markets, with oil prices crossing the $100–110 per barrel threshold, which creates a sharp divergence between exporters and importers in North Africa. Algeria and Libya will likely experience short-term fiscal windfalls that mask structural vulnerabilities. Increased revenues will offer breathing room yet also reduce the urgency of long-delayed reforms. Furthermore, rentier reflexes tend to reassert themselves under such conditions, reinforcing state-centric economic models that struggle to generate employment.
Meanwhile, Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco will face deteriorating balance-of-payments positions. Egypt’s external financing gap, for instance, which is already estimated at tens of billions of dollars annually, will widen further as fuel import bills surge. Tunisia’s precarious debt dynamics will grow more acute, raising the probability of further currency depreciation and subsidy cuts that worsen current pain.
Such divergences tend to carry geopolitical consequences. European demand will accelerate its shift toward North African gas suppliers as Gulf exports become unreliable over the long term. In turn, Algeria gains leverage in pricing and contract negotiations, but such leverage is transactional rather than transformative. European buyers remain wary, and infrastructure bottlenecks limit how far supply can scale. At the same time, Libya’s internal fragmentation constrains its ability to capitalize fully on favorable prices. Energy windfalls, therefore, risk entrenching uneven development rather than fostering regional stability.
Elsewhere, shipping disruptions compound these initial pressures. The Mediterranean Sea has effectively transformed from a global transit corridor into a “cul-de-sac” for Asian trade. Closure or effective disruption of both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea corridor will reconfigure global trade flows, and Mediterranean ports that depend on Asia–Europe transshipment are experiencing declining throughput. Port Said and Tangier Med, which together handle millions of containers annually, face reduced volumes as supply chains stall upstream.
Worse yet, freight rates for Asia–Mediterranean routes have spiked. Spot rates from Asia to the Mediterranean have spiked (up to $8,500/FEU), with carriers imposing emergency war surcharges. This acts as a direct tariff on North African economies reliant on imported intermediate goods, making such distortions extend beyond headline trade figures into industrial production across North Africa. Delays in electronics, machinery parts, and chemicals disrupt manufacturing cycles, particularly in Morocco’s automotive sector and Egypt’s industrial zones. Just-in-time production models break down under such conditions, forcing firms to either absorb higher inventory costs or curtail output. Smaller firms, lacking access to credit, face disproportionate risks of closure.
Further, threats to food security represent a far more insidious channel of impact. Fertilizer inputs linked to Gulf supply chains have become scarce and expensive, which will affect the 2026 agricultural season. Yield reductions of 20–30% are plausible in parts of the Sahel if input shortages persist. Such declines occur against a backdrop of already elevated food prices. In landlocked countries across much of the Sahel, transport costs account for a significant share of food prices. Rising diesel costs, therefore, translate directly into higher consumer prices, creating a feedback loop where energy inflation becomes food inflation.
Elsewhere, urban populations, particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, remain highly sensitive to bread prices. Subsidy systems and other safety nets, already strained, face renewed pressure. Governments confront a binary choice between fiscal stability and social stability. Cutting subsidies risks protests reminiscent of past unrest, while maintaining them accelerates debt accumulation. Neither option offers a sustainable equilibrium, which strains the region’s political economies. Governments that rely on implicit social contracts — subsidized goods in exchange for political acquiescence — will face mounting pressure as the fiscal space narrows.
Polarization within North Africa risks intensifying in parallel. Algeria’s alignment with anti-Western narratives contrasts with Morocco’s deepening security ties with Western partners and Israel. Such divergence risks hardening geopolitical fault lines. Already, arms imports into Morocco have increased significantly over recent years, and elevated threat perceptions could accelerate militarization on both sides.
Proxy dynamics in the Sahel and Horn of Africa will likely evolve. Iranian influence, while limited compared to other actors, has included security cooperation and arms transfers. Disruptions to Tehran’s capacity may reduce such flows, yet alternative suppliers stand ready to fill the gap. Russia and Türkiye already play dominant roles in regional arms markets. Reduced Iranian engagement does not necessarily translate into reduced militarization; it may simply shift the balance among external patrons.
Longer-term implications point toward a reordering of regional interdependence. Supply chains are likely to diversify, with greater emphasis on intra-African trade and alternative energy partnerships. However, such adjustments require time and investment. Immediate effects remain overwhelmingly negative for import-dependent economies. After all, the economic shocks of this magnitude tend to outlast the conflicts that trigger them. Reconstruction of supply chains, restoration of investor confidence, and stabilization of fiscal positions often take years. North Africa and the Sahel enter this period with limited buffers. Debt levels are high, foreign reserves are uneven, and institutional capacity varies widely.
A broader lesson emerges from the current crisis. Interconnected vulnerabilities have reached a point where disruptions in one region rapidly cascade across multiple domains. Energy, food, trade, and security are no longer separable policy arenas. Effective responses require integrated strategies that address these linkages rather than treating symptoms in isolation.
Absent such coordination, the region risks entering a cycle where external shocks repeatedly expose structural weaknesses and metastasize crises. War in the Gulf has once again revealed how deeply North Africa and the Sahel remain embedded in global systems over which they exert limited influence. Managing such exposure, rather than merely reacting to it, will better enhance the region’s resilience in an era of convergent crises, enduring volatility, and fragmenting global order.
Recent & Related