In international negotiations, while the interests and will of the States engaged in the process guide the outcome, the people in the room matter. Stimson brought together some of the original stakeholders involved in the ATT process, including diplomats and civil society researchers and advocates, a decade after its adoption to provide reflections on the ATT’s past decade and key insights into the treaty’s current impact and future trajectory.
Read all the commentaries and the report on the ATT at 10 webpage.
Ten years ago, I was privileged to lead the effort to adopt an Arms Trade Treaty. Our goal was simple: to reduce the human suffering caused by the conventional arms trade. We wanted this to be a treaty that had impact through the provision of normative standards, and through greater international cooperation and transparency. The arms trade touches every country across the globe from major exporting and importing countries to small transshipment States, and from large, populated States to small island developing countries. The ATT was designed to have something for everyone in order to make its impact. The key, however, was always going to be effective implementation.
I believe the commitment we demonstrated ten years ago was based on the recognition that this treaty and the standards it sets was long overdue. This Treaty is also important for the regions most effected by armed conflict and armed violence fueled by illicit trade in conventional arms — Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and in the Pacific.
As I reflect on the work we did to negotiate the ATT, I can still see today that the ATT is a strong, balanced and effective treaty. It was the strongest draft in several years of negotiations, and it was agreed by an overwhelming number of States. I do not believe we could have got a stronger or more effective treaty and kept the major exporters and importers on board. We certainly could not negotiate this treaty today due to the geopolitical realities that challenge the international system.
The treaty has made significant progress with 115 States Parties, the development of agreed processes and the provision of a forum to enhance international norms. But now is the time for boldness and clarity in ensuring a focus on the full and effective implementation of this treaty. To support those States that face critical challenges resulting from the flow of illicit and irresponsible arms. And to bring greater transparency to the arms trade, whereby States are prepared to discuss and explain their decisions.
So there is still much to be done and this includes pushing towards universalisation. In bringing this treaty into force we made a commitment to those States and those vulnerable people most impacted by the unregulated and illicit trade in conventional arms.
We need to meet this commitment through the effective implementation of the treaty’s provisions. This will take time. That said, in the short term, the ATT changes how countries engage in the arms trade and think about their responsibilities when transferring arms around the world.
H.E. Ambassador Peter Woolcott, Former Ambassador of Australia to the United Nations, Geneva (ATT Conference President 2013)
Conventional Arms, Latin America & the Caribbean, Latin America & the Caribbean
In international negotiations, while the interests and will of the States engaged in the process guide the outcome, the people in the room matter. Stimson brought together some of the original stakeholders involved in the ATT process, including diplomats and civil society researchers and advocates, a decade after its adoption to provide reflections on the ATT’s past decade and key insights into the treaty’s current impact and future trajectory.
Read all the commentaries and the report on the ATT at 10 webpage.
Ten years ago, I was privileged to lead the effort to adopt an Arms Trade Treaty. Our goal was simple: to reduce the human suffering caused by the conventional arms trade. We wanted this to be a treaty that had impact through the provision of normative standards, and through greater international cooperation and transparency. The arms trade touches every country across the globe from major exporting and importing countries to small transshipment States, and from large, populated States to small island developing countries. The ATT was designed to have something for everyone in order to make its impact. The key, however, was always going to be effective implementation.
I believe the commitment we demonstrated ten years ago was based on the recognition that this treaty and the standards it sets was long overdue. This Treaty is also important for the regions most effected by armed conflict and armed violence fueled by illicit trade in conventional arms — Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and in the Pacific.
As I reflect on the work we did to negotiate the ATT, I can still see today that the ATT is a strong, balanced and effective treaty. It was the strongest draft in several years of negotiations, and it was agreed by an overwhelming number of States. I do not believe we could have got a stronger or more effective treaty and kept the major exporters and importers on board. We certainly could not negotiate this treaty today due to the geopolitical realities that challenge the international system.
The treaty has made significant progress with 115 States Parties, the development of agreed processes and the provision of a forum to enhance international norms. But now is the time for boldness and clarity in ensuring a focus on the full and effective implementation of this treaty. To support those States that face critical challenges resulting from the flow of illicit and irresponsible arms. And to bring greater transparency to the arms trade, whereby States are prepared to discuss and explain their decisions.
So there is still much to be done and this includes pushing towards universalisation. In bringing this treaty into force we made a commitment to those States and those vulnerable people most impacted by the unregulated and illicit trade in conventional arms.
We need to meet this commitment through the effective implementation of the treaty’s provisions. This will take time. That said, in the short term, the ATT changes how countries engage in the arms trade and think about their responsibilities when transferring arms around the world.
H.E. Ambassador Peter Woolcott, Former Ambassador of Australia to the United Nations, Geneva (ATT Conference President 2013)
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.