Nuclear Disruption

Navigating the future of nuclear innovation and competition

In Emerging Technology Research

The nuclear sector is undergoing unprecedented transformation across both civilian and military domains. Stimson’s Nuclear Disruption initiative convenes leading experts and practitioners to shed light on the sources, trajectories, and impacts of these dramatic developments – and to shape their evolution. Through pathbreaking research, analysis, and engagements, this effort explores the rapidly shifting global nuclear landscape, spanning regional crises and conflicts, challenges to global order, non-proliferation goals, and strategic assumptions. It also investigates how disruptive technologies, energy security imperatives, and nuclear governance paradigms are redefining the future of nuclear policy and practice. This effort builds on the legacy of the Stimson Center’s founders Michael Krepon and Barry Blechman, who devoted their lives to preventing the use of nuclear weapons in regional conflicts.

The Nuclear Disruption Initiative focuses its work in three core areas:

  • Crises & Conflict. Flashpoints, deterrence dilemmas, and nuclear risk in volatile regions.
  • Strategy, Global Order, and Non-Proliferation. Nuclear doctrines, modernization debates, and arms control futures.
  • Technology, Energy & Nuclear Governance. Emerging tech, energy transitions, and governance regimes shaping nuclear security.
  • Crises & Conflict

    Nuclear flashpoints around the world are under growing pressure. From the war in Ukraine to India–Pakistan tensions, the Korean Peninsula, and Iran’s advancing capabilities, the risk of nuclear use in conflict is both real and rising. Crises are unfolding faster and escalating further than ever before, driven by intensifying great-power rivalry, rapid military modernization, and emerging technologies. Strategies to manage and mitigate nuclear risk are under mounting strain as arms control frameworks fray and confidence-building measures fail to account for new forms of instability. As regional crises risk spiraling into global nuclear confrontation, there is an urgent need to understand these evolving sources of instability, encourage restraint, and invest in novel mechanisms for crisis management.

    Commentary
    Unpacking what the recent Saudi-Pakistan defense pact means for U.S. Interests
    Asfandyar Mir
    Resource
    From the accelerating consolidation of power in eastern Libya to Egypt becoming Russia’s top African partner on nuclear power
    Hafed Al Ghwell • Lana Bleik
    Commentary
    Years of rising tensions between Iran and the IAEA came to a head after the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and personnel
    Anonymous
    Video
    Experts analyzing strategic dynamics between India and Pakistan in their recent crisis
    Christopher Clary • Debak Das • Tanvi Kulkarni...
    Commentary
    It is not necessary to have zero enrichment to have confidence that Iran is not diverting materials to build a bomb
    Barbara Slavin
    Commentary
    Russia fuels Bushehr, complicating Iran’s insistence on maintaining its own nuclear enrichment capacity
    Emil Avdaliani
    Strategy, Global Order, and Non-Proliferation

    Tensions among major powers, at their highest point in decades, threaten to reignite a new, three-way nuclear arms race among the United States, Russia, and China as they expand and modernize their arsenals. Meanwhile, uncertainty about U.S. commitment to the defense of long-standing strategic partners drives open deliberation about their seeking their own nuclear weapons. The international community’s failures to prevent North Korea’s nuclear weapons program or to establish transparency into Iran’s nuclear program further add to the forces eroding the decades-old “grand bargain” of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, opening the world to a new era of sharply increased nuclear risk.

    Video
    In the second episode of the “Business of War,” a docu-series by Al Jazeera English, Julia discusses the origins of the nuclear triad and the folly of ongoing modernization efforts
    Julia Gledhill
    Remarks
    Examining how nuclear weapons have shaped international politics over the last eight decades
    Christopher Preble
    Podcast Episode 🎧
    Nuclear threats are rising. What can be done to contain them?
    Christopher Preble • Zack Cooper • Melanie Marlowe
    Podcast Episode 🎧
    The Net Assessment crew debates President Trump’s decision to join the Israeli war against Iran.
    Christopher Preble • Melanie Marlowe • Zack Cooper
    Podcast Episode 🎧
    The Net Assessment Team explores the prospects, and the necessity, for new arms control agreements.
    Christopher Preble • Melanie Marlowe • Zack Cooper
    Podcast Episode 🎧
    Chris and Geoff join John Glaser on the Cato Institute’s Power Problems Podcast
    Christopher Preble • Geoff Wilson
    Technology, Energy & Nuclear Governance

    The global nuclear industry is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by technological innovation, decarbonization, energy security, and geopolitical competition. Civilian demand for power is rising just as disruptions are affecting traditional nuclear fuel supply chains. Start-ups, Big Tech, and established firms alike are developing next-generation fission and fusion reactors, redefining what is possible for both newcomers and traditional nuclear states. At the same time, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and other innovations are reshaping every stage of the nuclear enterprise, from fuel cycle management and reactor design to safeguards, verification, and decision-making. These advances offer powerful tools for operational efficiency and strengthening nuclear security. This growing technological and industrial diversity brings risks of fragmented supply chains and uneven regulation but also presents an opportunity to rethink governance and cooperation towards building a more resilient, secure, sustainable nuclear future.

    Commentary
    Eighty years after the dawn of the nuclear age, current plans for the rapid expansion of advanced reactors to satisfy global energy needs only reinforce that nuclear security cannot be optional. Sustaining a pipeline of expertise is essential to ensure that nuclear energy delivers on its promise while minimizing risks of theft, terrorism, and proliferation
    David Kenneth Smith • Kathryn Rauhut
    Resource
    Attacks on Ukrainian and Russian nuclear facilities, new nuclear reactors and fuels in the U.S., and Anthropic’s efforts to identify nuclear weapons conversations with its AI models
    Christina McAllister • Braden Holt
    Commentary
    Why intensifying protectionism could make it harder to enforce WMD nonproliferation regimes
    Christina McAllister • Mark Albon
    Commentary
    The next wave of technological evolution is disrupting nuclear stability, reshaping verification, and challenging the future of arms control and nonproliferation.
    Cindy Vestergaard
    Policy Memo
    At a global turning point, converging technologies demand coordinated action and strategies for CBRN nonproliferation and security
    Cindy Vestergaard • Christina McAllister • Julian Mueller-Kaler...
    Resource
    Israel and U.S. strike Iranian nuclear facilities, drones attack ZNPP training center, and AI datacenters continue to fuel demand for nuclear energy investments
    Christina McAllister • Braden Holt