President Barack Obama’s budget request for fiscal year 2015 makes significant progress in cutting excess overhead costs and focusing resources in areas critical to national security, according to an assessment released by the Stimson Center. The assessment examines how well the president’s budget incorporates the recommendations of a panel of 17 distinguished defense experts, including former high-ranking military officers and national security policymakers, who developed a new U.S. defense strategy and published 27 specific recommendations for implementing that strategy in Strategic Agility, a report released last fall.
The Stimson Center assessment finds that the president’s proposal fully incorporates 12 of the panel’s 27 recommendations and partially incorporates another nine. If implemented, the president’s budget would take substantial but incomplete steps towards streamlining management and overhead costs, adjusting the military’s force structure to face current threats and investing in the new equipment most critical for future needs.
“Overall, the president’s proposal goes a long way to incorporating the recommendations in Strategic Agility,” said Barry Blechman, distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center and chairman of the Defense Advisory Committee that authored Strategic Agility. “However, by enacting all of the proposed recommendations, the administration and Congress could reduce the amount of uncertainty that has had a debilitating impact on strategic planning while, at the same time, preserving a strong national defense.”
To read the full assessment, click here.
Some of the recommendations the president incorporated include:
- Maintaining the number of aircraft carriers and reducing Army force structure;
- Maintaining ready special operations forces;
- Canceling the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle and cutting minor procurement;
- Reducing contractors, headquarters, and defense agencies; and
- Consolidating infrastructure and reforming health benefits
Several recommendations, such as reducing civilian employees, extricating uniform personnel from non-military tasks and slowing the purchases of the F-35 fighter plane, were only partially incorporated. And another five were not, including buying an additional AEGIS Destroyer a year.
Grounded in a fundamental assessment of US interests and the threats to those interests, Strategic Agility charts a new US defense strategy for a new era, and lays out specific steps to implement such a strategy in these times of constrained defense resources. The report warns if these steps are not taken, US defense could be vitally weakened.
Conventional Arms
Share:
President Barack Obama’s budget request for fiscal year 2015 makes significant progress in cutting excess overhead costs and focusing resources in areas critical to national security, according to an assessment released by the Stimson Center. The assessment examines how well the president’s budget incorporates the recommendations of a panel of 17 distinguished defense experts, including former high-ranking military officers and national security policymakers, who developed a new U.S. defense strategy and published 27 specific recommendations for implementing that strategy in Strategic Agility, a report released last fall.
The Stimson Center assessment finds that the president’s proposal fully incorporates 12 of the panel’s 27 recommendations and partially incorporates another nine. If implemented, the president’s budget would take substantial but incomplete steps towards streamlining management and overhead costs, adjusting the military’s force structure to face current threats and investing in the new equipment most critical for future needs.
“Overall, the president’s proposal goes a long way to incorporating the recommendations in Strategic Agility,” said Barry Blechman, distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center and chairman of the Defense Advisory Committee that authored Strategic Agility. “However, by enacting all of the proposed recommendations, the administration and Congress could reduce the amount of uncertainty that has had a debilitating impact on strategic planning while, at the same time, preserving a strong national defense.”
To read the full assessment, click here.
Some of the recommendations the president incorporated include:
Several recommendations, such as reducing civilian employees, extricating uniform personnel from non-military tasks and slowing the purchases of the F-35 fighter plane, were only partially incorporated. And another five were not, including buying an additional AEGIS Destroyer a year.
Grounded in a fundamental assessment of US interests and the threats to those interests, Strategic Agility charts a new US defense strategy for a new era, and lays out specific steps to implement such a strategy in these times of constrained defense resources. The report warns if these steps are not taken, US defense could be vitally weakened.
Recent & Related
Southward Creep: The Sahel Insurgency Reaches Coastal West Africa
Balancing Export-Led Growth and Labor Protections in Morocco
Mali Attacks: Aggravating the Sahel Security Crisis
Iran Applies Different Postwar Approaches to the Persian Gulf Arab States
The EU’s Technocratic Trap in Libya: How Brussels Is Ceding the Mediterranean
The Sovereignty Paradox: Why GCC Security Integration Remains Elusive
Japan’s Tentative Entry Into a Shifting Global Arms Market
The Time is Ripe for Next Steps on US-Japan Military Shipbuilding Cooperation
Israel Cannot Achieve Normalization with Lebanon by Bombing It
Sudan: How One of the Most Severe Humanitarian Crises Became Marginalized in the Global System
Beneath the Strait: Iran Could Threaten Gulf Data Centers, Undersea Cables
Mali’s Post-Alignment Strategy: Sovereignty, Partnerships, and the Limits of Stabilization
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
North Korea’s Integration of AI Across Cyber, Economic, and Military Domains
AI in the Age of Fake (Imagined) Content
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.