President Barack Obama’s budget request for fiscal year 2015 makes significant progress in cutting excess overhead costs and focusing resources in areas critical to national security, according to an assessment released by the Stimson Center. The assessment examines how well the president’s budget incorporates the recommendations of a panel of 17 distinguished defense experts, including former high-ranking military officers and national security policymakers, who developed a new U.S. defense strategy and published 27 specific recommendations for implementing that strategy in Strategic Agility, a report released last fall.
The Stimson Center assessment finds that the president’s proposal fully incorporates 12 of the panel’s 27 recommendations and partially incorporates another nine. If implemented, the president’s budget would take substantial but incomplete steps towards streamlining management and overhead costs, adjusting the military’s force structure to face current threats and investing in the new equipment most critical for future needs.
“Overall, the president’s proposal goes a long way to incorporating the recommendations in Strategic Agility,” said Barry Blechman, distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center and chairman of the Defense Advisory Committee that authored Strategic Agility. “However, by enacting all of the proposed recommendations, the administration and Congress could reduce the amount of uncertainty that has had a debilitating impact on strategic planning while, at the same time, preserving a strong national defense.”
To read the full assessment, click here.
Some of the recommendations the president incorporated include:
- Maintaining the number of aircraft carriers and reducing Army force structure;
- Maintaining ready special operations forces;
- Canceling the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicle and cutting minor procurement;
- Reducing contractors, headquarters, and defense agencies; and
- Consolidating infrastructure and reforming health benefits
Several recommendations, such as reducing civilian employees, extricating uniform personnel from non-military tasks and slowing the purchases of the F-35 fighter plane, were only partially incorporated. And another five were not, including buying an additional AEGIS Destroyer a year.
Grounded in a fundamental assessment of US interests and the threats to those interests, Strategic Agility charts a new US defense strategy for a new era, and lays out specific steps to implement such a strategy in these times of constrained defense resources. The report warns if these steps are not taken, US defense could be vitally weakened.
Conventional Arms
President Barack Obama’s budget request for fiscal year 2015 makes significant progress in cutting excess overhead costs and focusing resources in areas critical to national security, according to an assessment released by the Stimson Center. The assessment examines how well the president’s budget incorporates the recommendations of a panel of 17 distinguished defense experts, including former high-ranking military officers and national security policymakers, who developed a new U.S. defense strategy and published 27 specific recommendations for implementing that strategy in Strategic Agility, a report released last fall.
The Stimson Center assessment finds that the president’s proposal fully incorporates 12 of the panel’s 27 recommendations and partially incorporates another nine. If implemented, the president’s budget would take substantial but incomplete steps towards streamlining management and overhead costs, adjusting the military’s force structure to face current threats and investing in the new equipment most critical for future needs.
“Overall, the president’s proposal goes a long way to incorporating the recommendations in Strategic Agility,” said Barry Blechman, distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center and chairman of the Defense Advisory Committee that authored Strategic Agility. “However, by enacting all of the proposed recommendations, the administration and Congress could reduce the amount of uncertainty that has had a debilitating impact on strategic planning while, at the same time, preserving a strong national defense.”
To read the full assessment, click here.
Some of the recommendations the president incorporated include:
Several recommendations, such as reducing civilian employees, extricating uniform personnel from non-military tasks and slowing the purchases of the F-35 fighter plane, were only partially incorporated. And another five were not, including buying an additional AEGIS Destroyer a year.
Grounded in a fundamental assessment of US interests and the threats to those interests, Strategic Agility charts a new US defense strategy for a new era, and lays out specific steps to implement such a strategy in these times of constrained defense resources. The report warns if these steps are not taken, US defense could be vitally weakened.
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.