China’s absence from the COP26 climate summit has drawn criticism from all corners. Given Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s lack of foreign travel since January 2020, his Glasgow no-show did not come as a surprise. China has already committed to achieving peak emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, so perhaps Beijing thought it had little more to offer at this stage. However, as the world’s biggest carbon polluter, questions over how China aims to complete its climate change commitments loom large.
China’s push toward carbon neutrality will have a major impact on the future structure of its energy sources. This in turn will eventually alter China’s relationship with Middle East countries that China has depended on for crude oil supply for decades. But carbon emissions from China’s oil use are dwarfed by the damage done from burning coal, and it is cutting out coal, not oil, that is Beijing’s immediate concern. While the end game for everyone is renewable energy, in the shorter term, the phasing out of coal-fired power stations will lead to China buying more oil from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries. Contrary to what many at COP26 might say, the push for net zero is likely to strengthen relations between Beijing and the Middle East based on the supply of oil.
China’s need for more oil to see it through this transition squares with Riyadh’s plans to maintain crude production while using methods like carbon capture and planting vast forests to reach net zero carbon emissions. This approach has been labeled the “circular carbon economy,” and continuing to serve oil to its biggest customer China has been factored into the plan. As China attempts to bring down coal consumption while maintaining its economic edge, its demand for Middle East oil is likely to increase rather than decrease in the foreseeable future.
This piece was originally published in Syndication Bureau.
China, Diplomacy & Dialogue, Diplomacy & Dialogue
Share:
This piece was originally published in Syndication Bureau.
China’s absence from the COP26 climate summit has drawn criticism from all corners. Given Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s lack of foreign travel since January 2020, his Glasgow no-show did not come as a surprise. China has already committed to achieving peak emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, so perhaps Beijing thought it had little more to offer at this stage. However, as the world’s biggest carbon polluter, questions over how China aims to complete its climate change commitments loom large.
China’s push toward carbon neutrality will have a major impact on the future structure of its energy sources. This in turn will eventually alter China’s relationship with Middle East countries that China has depended on for crude oil supply for decades. But carbon emissions from China’s oil use are dwarfed by the damage done from burning coal, and it is cutting out coal, not oil, that is Beijing’s immediate concern. While the end game for everyone is renewable energy, in the shorter term, the phasing out of coal-fired power stations will lead to China buying more oil from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries. Contrary to what many at COP26 might say, the push for net zero is likely to strengthen relations between Beijing and the Middle East based on the supply of oil.
China’s need for more oil to see it through this transition squares with Riyadh’s plans to maintain crude production while using methods like carbon capture and planting vast forests to reach net zero carbon emissions. This approach has been labeled the “circular carbon economy,” and continuing to serve oil to its biggest customer China has been factored into the plan. As China attempts to bring down coal consumption while maintaining its economic edge, its demand for Middle East oil is likely to increase rather than decrease in the foreseeable future.
This piece was originally published in Syndication Bureau.
Recent & Related
Tripoli’s New Leverage: How the American Initiative Changed the Rules of Negotiation
America’s Chip Future Still Runs Through Taiwan
Postwar, Iran Is at a Crossroads
When Formal Alliances Stop Doing Political Work: The Canada-US Alliance in Crisis
Post-War Street Rallies in Iran: The Ascendance of Religious over National Identity
The Next Iran Nuclear Deal: Lessons from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and North Korea
The Negative Strategic Consequences of the US-Iran War for Iraq
What OCHA’s 87 Million Lives Campaign Reveals About the Future of UN Leadership
What The Iran War Reveals About Airpower
The Status of Transitional Justice in Syria
Iran-Qatar Electricity Grid Interconnection Plan Shows Pragmatism in the Shadow of War
North Africa Regional Outlook: June 17, 2026
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
Breaking Silos to Beat Scams: Why Holistic Law Enforcement Matters
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Violence Against Women and Girls
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.