Project

War in the 21st Century

Exploring the changing character of war and its implications for US foreign and defense policy

About the Project

War has an unchanging essence—what Carl von Clausewitz described as a “paradoxical trinity” of passion and primordial violence, chance and probability, and reason and political purpose. But each war is unique in that it reflects the geopolitics, society, culture, economics, technology, law, and methods of organization, and ways of thinking—or what Clausewitz termed “the spirit of the age.” Today, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, characterized by clusters of technological breakthroughs in nanotechnology, additive manufacturing, materials science, robotics, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing, together with the widespread diffusion of advanced technologies are profoundly reshaping the world’s battlefields. The War in the 21st Century project aims to challenge existing assumptions and expectations about war, asking how the United States and its allies and partners ought to rethink and adjust existing doctrine, operational concepts, and procurement priorities to prepare. The answers to these questions will determine whether the United States and its allies and partners anticipate change and adapt to change –or get taken by surprise in a war they expected to win decisively.

Research & Writing

Commentary

Iran’s mining of the Strait of Hormuz turns cheap, asymmetric weapons into strategic leverage against the U.S. Navy.
March 23, 2026

Commentary

Understanding Iran’s military strategy in response to Operation Epic Fury.
March 13, 2026

Issue Brief

Chinese missiles and artillery could ground Taiwan’s F-16s for weeks. Resilient, mobile defenses are essential to contest the skies.
March 5, 2026

Commentary

Following January’s Venezuela raid, it’s important for civilian policymakers to not become overconfident, and to ensure that all possible escalatory steps are considered before military action is taken.
February 4, 2026

Commentary

The 2026 NDS promises prioritization but undermines it with expanded commitments, ambiguous burden-sharing, and overconfidence in airpower.
January 27, 2026

Issue Brief

America’s legacy fleet is vulnerable; Cheap, mass-producible containerized munitions can help close the gap.
November 6, 2025

Commentary

Resumption of nuclear tests by the United States will send a destabilizing political signal that undermines deterrence and intensifies nuclear competition.
October 30, 2025

Report

Questioning the logic of U.S. nuclear weapons policy in the 21st Century.
February 19, 2025

Policy Memo

Resuming nuclear testing by the United States is unnecessary and destabilizing.
January 15, 2025

Report

Chinese missiles attacks on air bases could thwart effective U.S. sortie generation at the outset of a military conflict.
December 12, 2024

Policy Memo

The next administration’s National Defense Strategy should prioritize the challenge posed by China, shifting away from Europe and the Middle East to focus more on deterrence and defense in the Indo-Pacific.
November 20, 2024

Issue Brief

Exploring the impediments to a US-led Indo-Pacific alliance and overcoming the geographic hurdles to creating regional military coalitions.
April 15, 2024

Policy Memo

A new war in the Middle East would prove to be too costly for the United States in both the short and long term.
February 16, 2024

Op-Ed

A new strategy can protect Kyiv and stop Moscow from winning.
January 10, 2024

Issue Brief

The four “tyrannies”— distance, water, time, and scale —complicate logistics, and when combined, undermine deterrence in the Indo-Pacific
November 8, 2023

Commentary

Kelly Grieco joins Weekend Edition podcast host Scott Simon to discuss the impact of drones on modern warfare in the context of Ukraine
August 5, 2023
Air denial is not a new strategy, but neither is an alternative based on air superiority and penetrating strikes.
April 3, 2023

Policy Memo

The pursuit of military dominance through technological superiority, amid rapidly diffusing dual-use technologies, is based on flawed and unproven assumptions.
March 21, 2023

Commentary

How have Washington’s common wisdoms — and ours — about Ukraine held up?
February 15, 2023

Policy Paper

Defense is inherently the stronger form of air warfare, and new and emerging technologies and tactics are only strengthening the defender’s advantage
January 25, 2023

Commentary

In this podcast, Melanie Marlowe, and Zack Cooper, and the Stimson Center’s Christopher Preble discuss whether it is possible, and wise, to try to stave off a conflict with China over Taiwan — possibly for a very long time.
January 5, 2023

Commentary

Are Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling, North Korea’s advancing capabilities, and China’s nuclear modernization program likely to spur additional nuclear proliferation? How satisfied are South Korea and Japan with current U.S. nuclear extended deterrence guarantees? And what should policymakers in Washington do in response to questions about the U.S. nuclear umbrella?
December 22, 2022

Commentary

Is the National Defense Strategy actually a strategy? In this podcast, Melanie Marlowe, and Zack Cooper, and the Stimson Center’s Christopher Preble debate the Biden administration’s recently released National Defense Strategy.
November 10, 2022

Commentary

Was the National Defense Strategy worth the wait?
November 2, 2022

Op-Ed

Originally published in Defense News.
September 8, 2022

Commentary

Originally published by the Atlantic Council.
August 30, 2022

Policy Memo

Policy makers should consider the importance of having units and platforms available for disaster response.
July 22, 2022

Sub-Projects

There are no subprojects associated with this project.

Events

Load More