War in the 21st Century

Exploring the changing character of war and its implications for US foreign and defense policy

War has an unchanging essence—what Carl von Clausewitz described as a “paradoxical trinity” of passion and primordial violence, chance and probability, and reason and political purpose. But each war is unique in that it reflects the geopolitics, society, culture, economics, technology, law, and methods of organization, and ways of thinking—or what Clausewitz termed “the spirit of the age.” Today, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, characterized by clusters of technological breakthroughs in nanotechnology, additive manufacturing, materials science, robotics, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing, together with the widespread diffusion of advanced technologies are profoundly reshaping the world’s battlefields. The War in the 21st Century project aims to challenge existing assumptions and expectations about war, asking how the United States and its allies and partners ought to rethink and adjust existing doctrine, operational concepts, and procurement priorities to prepare. The answers to these questions will determine whether the United States and its allies and partners anticipate change and adapt to change –or get taken by surprise in a war they expected to win decisively.

Commentary
How have Washington's common wisdoms — and ours — about Ukraine held up?
James Siebens • Kelly A. Grieco • Evan Cooper...

Research & Writing

Policy Memo
A new war in the Middle East would prove to be too costly for the United States in both the short and long term
C. William Walldorf, Jr.
Op-Ed
A new strategy can protect Kyiv and stop Moscow from winning
Emma Ashford • Kelly A. Grieco
Issue Brief
The four “tyrannies”— distance, water, time, and scale —complicate logistics, and when combined, undermine deterrence in the Indo-Pacific
Col. Maximillian K. Bremer • Kelly A. Grieco
Commentary
Kelly Grieco joins Weekend Edition podcast host Scott Simon to discuss how the Ukraine War has changed the nature of war
Kelly A. Grieco
Air denial is not a new strategy, but neither is an alternative based on air superiority and penetrating strikes
Col. Maximillian K. Bremer • Kelly A. Grieco
Policy Memo
The pursuit of military dominance through technological superiority, amid rapidly diffusing dual-use technologies, is based on flawed and unproven assumptions
Kelly A. Grieco • Robert A. Manning
Commentary
How have Washington's common wisdoms — and ours — about Ukraine held up?
James Siebens • Kelly A. Grieco • Evan Cooper...
Policy Paper
Defense is inherently the stronger form of air warfare, and new and emerging technologies and tactics are only strengthening the defender’s advantage
Col. Maximillian K. Bremer • Kelly A. Grieco
Commentary
Christopher Preble joins the Net Assessment podcast to discuss whether conflict over Taiwan is avoidable
Christopher Preble
Commentary
Christopher Preble joins the Net Assessment podcast to discuss the risks of nuclear proliferation in Asia
Christopher Preble
Commentary
Christopher Preble joins the Net Assessment podcast to discuss national security priorities
Christopher Preble
Commentary
Christopher Preble joins the Net Assessment podcast to discuss the Biden administration's National Defense Strategy
Christopher Preble
Commentary
Was the National Defense Strategy worth the wait?
Op-Ed
The success of Ukraine’s air denial strategy stems not from Russian shortcomings but a more fundamental and systemic shift from offense to defense dominance.
Col. Maximillian K. Bremer • Kelly A. Grieco
Op-Ed
Though the impulse to hold tight to the air superiority paradigm may be strong, the future of air warfare is denial.
Col. Maximillian K. Bremer • Kelly A. Grieco

Events

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea