Arms Trade Transparency in Conflict: ATT Reporting on Arms Transfers to Ukraine

Examining reporting patterns and identifying good practice for Ukraine’s arms suppliers

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has spurred a dramatic global surge in arms transfers to Kyiv, raising important questions around transparency in the global arms trade. Given the risks posed by the unprecedented volume of arms transfers to Ukraine, it is essential that governments have a clear picture of the type and quantity of weapons flowing into the region. At the same time, some governments have expressed concerns about the consequences of disclosing potentially sensitive information around the military aid effort. This policy paper examines the annual reporting practices of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) States Parties that have provided arms transfers to Ukraine since the Russian invasion in order to better understand their transparency efforts, assess the Ukraine war in Ukraine’s overall impact on transparency and reporting in the ATT context, and identify good practices for balancing security concerns and transparency commitments in ATT annual reporting.

Download

The complete version of this item is available as a download.

Executive Summary

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has spurred a dramatic global surge in arms transfers to Kyiv, raising important questions around transparency in the global arms trade. This policy paper explores how these questions have been addressed in the context of Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) annual reporting.

Less than a year after the invasion, Ukraine had already become the world’s third-largest major arms importer. Given the unprecedented volume of arms transfers to Ukraine, it is essential that governments have a clear picture of the type and quantity of weapons flowing into the region to facilitate accurate assessments of military capabilities and intentions, inform diplomatic initiatives, and enhance efforts to monitor weapons use and ensure accountability for human rights and international humanitarian law violations. Greater insight into international arms transfers to Ukraine will also have significant long-term benefits, including facilitating efforts to prevent and address arms diversion long after the fighting ends. Despite the inherent risks of such a large-scale military aid effort, some governments have expressed concerns about the consequences of disclosing the details of their arms exports to a country in the midst of an armed conflict—particularly one whose adversary has threatened to treat support for its military effort as an act of war. Moreover, the lack of transparency surrounding arms exports to Russia—which procures arms from opaque and illicit sources—may raise questions as to whether it is appropriate to reveal potentially sensitive information surrounding Ukraine’s arms procurement.

Questions around arms trade transparency for transfers to Ukraine are particularly salient for ATT States Parties, not only because of their transparency commitments but also because of the outsized role they have played in supplying Ukraine with conventional arms following Russia’s invasion. Twenty-six of the 29 countries that exported major arms to Ukraine in 2022, according to estimates from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), were ATT States Parties (notably absent from the list is the United States—the largest provider of arms to Ukraine).2 Together, ATT States Parties accounted for 61 percent of all major arms exports to Ukraine in 2022.3

Recent & Related

Commentary
Elias Yousif • Rachel Stohl

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea