Low-flying threats challenge NATO’s deterrence in the East

The glory days of fighter planes and swirling dog fights may or may not have passed, but they are no longer the only or most important fights in the sky.

By  Col. Maximillian K. Bremer  •  Kelly A. Grieco

Originally published on Defense News.

With a contested boundary standing between the air and ground, NATO ground forces cannot count on fighting under a protective aerial umbrella or effective close air support. High-end aircraft are simply too expensive and few in number to put at risk in a contested air littoral. The alliance must first close the capabilities gap. NATO militaries could upgrade or acquire more heavy artillery and ground-based air defense systems. Allied forces should also acquire and integrate large numbers of small, cheap aerial drones with other high-end air assets and ground-based fires into NATO’s scheme of maneuver to gain localized air superiority and added firepower delivery, as well as blunt Russian advantages.

Read the article on Defense News.

Recent & Related

Policy Memo
Mathew Burrows • Robert A. Manning
Policy Memo
Chris O. Ògúnmọ́dẹdé

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea