Research
Menu
COVID-19 Notice: To protect the health of our team and our community, Stimson Center staff are working remotely. The Stimson office is closed to all visitors. All public events are now online. Staff remain available via email, phone, and video conference. During this time, the Stimson Center will continue its important work, informing policymakers and the public — here, on social media, and via email.
THE STIMSON CENTER
Engaging new voices, generating innovative ideas and analysis, and building solutions to promote international security, prosperity, and justice.
Engaging new voices, generating innovative ideas and analysis, and building solutions to promote international security, prosperity, and justice.
Copyright The Henry L. Stimson Center
Spotlight on Japan’s seventy-year old constitution
There is more than the usual interest in the seventieth birthday of Japan’s constitution, importantly because of a move to revision of its most unusual and distinguishing feature — Article 9, its famous peace clause. When enacted in 1947, the Japanese constitution embodied the idealism — renunciation of war, gender equality, democracy, equality before the law, and the rule of law, to name a few — with which Japan began its journey to postwar reconstruction.
It would be difficult to make the case that the constitution hasn’t served Japan’s interests well over the past 70 years. But times change and there are also other aspects of the constitution that some think are also due for an update. While debate revolves around how to modernise the constitution in light of new concepts such as privacy and environmental rights, the most intense point of contention is Article 9.
This article was originally published by East Asia Forum on April 29, 2017. Read the full article here.