In light of reporting today that President Obama has decided to seek a new United Nations Security Council resolution that would reaffirm objectives of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Stimson Center experts Laicie Heeley and Michael Krepon released the following statements:
“Much as he began, President Obama will end his term with a strong statement against nuclear weapons. This is likely to be a largely symbolic move, since an international norm against nuclear testing already exists. But it may encourage those countries who have not yet signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to take action, and that in and of itself would be a major accomplishment.” — Laicie Heeley, Fellow, Stimson Center
“Twenty years in limbo, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is in need of reaffirmation — and not just with the usual boilerplate of a U.N. General Assembly resolution. Kudos to the Obama administration. This resolution does not circumvent senatorial prerogatives. The Senate’s consent to ratification is still needed. But any initiative that helps raise the bar against testing — and helps penalize the one state that still tests — is worth taking.” — Michael Krepon, Co-founder, Stimson Center
Photo credit: IAEA via Flickr
In light of reporting today that President Obama has decided to seek a new United Nations Security Council resolution that would reaffirm objectives of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Stimson Center experts Laicie Heeley and Michael Krepon released the following statements:
“Much as he began, President Obama will end his term with a strong statement against nuclear weapons. This is likely to be a largely symbolic move, since an international norm against nuclear testing already exists. But it may encourage those countries who have not yet signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to take action, and that in and of itself would be a major accomplishment.” — Laicie Heeley, Fellow, Stimson Center
“Twenty years in limbo, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is in need of reaffirmation — and not just with the usual boilerplate of a U.N. General Assembly resolution. Kudos to the Obama administration. This resolution does not circumvent senatorial prerogatives. The Senate’s consent to ratification is still needed. But any initiative that helps raise the bar against testing — and helps penalize the one state that still tests — is worth taking.” — Michael Krepon, Co-founder, Stimson Center
Photo credit: IAEA via Flickr
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.