The Future of Social Science & National Security

Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice

Scholars and policymakers explore the challenges and benefits of national security collaboration between the Beltway and the Ivory Tower

At least since the First World War, national security policymakers have sought to tap social science expertise, as part of broader efforts to marshal the national’s full arsenal of scientific resources, to advance United States national security. The results of those efforts have varied over time, with more success coming during wartime or periods of more intense international competition. The Department of Defense’s recent Minerva Research Initiative is the most recent such effort, launched in 2008 in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the on-going wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The 9/11 attacks are almost twenty years in the past now, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have largely wound down, so the time is propitious to take stock of this latest effort to mobilize social science for national security, identifying lessons learned and practices for future implementations. Our goal is to avoid the all-too-common historical pattern of reinventing the social science and national security wheel.

Project Note
A year of essays on the Beltway-Ivory Tower relationship
Michael Desch • David Montgomery • Mathew Burrows

Research & Writing

Chapter
A discussion with Dr. Flagg on her perspective from both inside and outside government on social science research and national security policymaking
Melissa Flagg • Michael Desch • David Montgomery
Chapter
This chapter demonstrates how and why scholars and think tanks have had an uneven influence in the policymaking process
Mathew Burrows
Chapter
A two-way street between journalists and social scientists will be more critical than ever to promote an engaged and informed public
Howard LaFranchi
Chapter
The story of an academic study of nuclear risks that had a direct impact on American policy and helped prevent a disastrous nuclear outcome
Steven E. Miller
Chapter
With security issues tied to human behavior, cutting edge psychological science can be an indispensable tool for effective policy
Arie W. Kruglanski • Michele J. Gelfand
Chapter
Flexible funding, practitioners trained in social science, and a bit of luck fostered a scholarly community that applies data-driven research to a broad range of national security challenges.
Eli Berman • Jacob N. Shapiro
Chapter
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine plays an important role in ensuring that the social and behavioral sciences inform key policy issues, including national security
Barbara A. Wanchisen • Adrienne Stith Butler • Mary Ellen O’Connell
Chapter
Policy journals play a crucial role in national security by subjecting official policy to independent interrogation and bringing scholars and practitioners together on neutral ground for constructive discussion
Gideon Rose
Chapter
Exploring the many ways in which journal articles may influence national security policy
Sean M. Lynn-Jones
Chapter
The century-long history of efforts to mobilize the social sciences for national security offers cautionary tales and important lessons for the future of national security research
Joy Rohde
Chapter
Government and academia have had a long and tempestuous relationship complete with courtship, romance, heartbreak, separation, and reconciliation.
Thomas G. Mahnken
Chapter
From the beginning of the 20th Century, there has been a tension between the two objectives of rigor and relevance which explain the uneven course of efforts to mobilize social sciences in support of national security policy.
Michael Desch
Project Note
A year of essays on the Beltway-Ivory Tower relationship
Michael Desch • David Montgomery • Mathew Burrows

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea