Beijing’s enthusiasm for engaging in high-level talks with the US government has waned, reflecting China’s perception of the Biden Administration as incompetent for its ignorance of Chinese culture and history and its excessive arrogance. Instead, China has already expressed great interest in the next presidential election, hoping for any leader other than Joe Biden. As serious communication between the two great powers continues to falter, talks about common ground in Taiwan seem increasingly unlikely. Even the recent US push for high-level diplomacy is viewed as an attempt to address allies’ fears of potential conflict due to the lack of communication, while also promoting a propaganda campaign depicting China as unreasonable. It is clear that both sides must analyze each other’s vital interests and learn what is unrealistic and what can be accomplished to mitigate any risks of war.
In a world dominated by the struggle between autocracy and democracy, it is also essential to reevaluate who is defending the status quo. In an ironic turn of events, while China seeks to become a “normal” state, a self-sufficient great power without a history of territorial expansion, the definition of “normal” is evolving. China adopts a multipolar diplomacy approach to maintain peaceful foreign relations, while the US is reverting to a unipolar fantasy by bolstering military alliances reminiscent of Cold War bloc politics. As interests and the status quo evolve, it is integral for both nations to realize what is feasible for any kind of diplomatic dialogue to be had. Only by doing this, can the Biden Administration reinstate itself as a nation ready for proper diplomatic talks in this Great power competition.
Read the full commentary in the South China Morning Post.
Originally published in the South China Morning Post
Grand Strategy
Beijing’s enthusiasm for engaging in high-level talks with the US government has waned, reflecting China’s perception of the Biden Administration as incompetent for its ignorance of Chinese culture and history and its excessive arrogance. Instead, China has already expressed great interest in the next presidential election, hoping for any leader other than Joe Biden. As serious communication between the two great powers continues to falter, talks about common ground in Taiwan seem increasingly unlikely. Even the recent US push for high-level diplomacy is viewed as an attempt to address allies’ fears of potential conflict due to the lack of communication, while also promoting a propaganda campaign depicting China as unreasonable. It is clear that both sides must analyze each other’s vital interests and learn what is unrealistic and what can be accomplished to mitigate any risks of war.
In a world dominated by the struggle between autocracy and democracy, it is also essential to reevaluate who is defending the status quo. In an ironic turn of events, while China seeks to become a “normal” state, a self-sufficient great power without a history of territorial expansion, the definition of “normal” is evolving. China adopts a multipolar diplomacy approach to maintain peaceful foreign relations, while the US is reverting to a unipolar fantasy by bolstering military alliances reminiscent of Cold War bloc politics. As interests and the status quo evolve, it is integral for both nations to realize what is feasible for any kind of diplomatic dialogue to be had. Only by doing this, can the Biden Administration reinstate itself as a nation ready for proper diplomatic talks in this Great power competition.
Read the full commentary in the South China Morning Post.
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.