On March 1, 2023, Mali submitted a letter to the Security Council president rejecting France as penholder on all issues concerning Mali, claiming France was responsible for “acts of aggression, violation of our airspace, subversion and destabilization.” Though Mali’s demand for a new penholder has not found support among the Council, this incident calls for a renewed look at the penholder system and may present an opportunity to promote greater inclusivity and unity in how the Council produces outcomes, particularly when it comes to context-specific matters.
Penholder diversification has become a noted topic of discussion in recent months, raised by the Security Council’s ten elected members (E10) in a joint statement at the 2022 Open Debate on Working Methods of the Security Council, and by Russia through the subsequent organization of an Arria-formula meeting on penholdership. While, for a number of reasons, a full overhaul of the penholder system would not be practical or appropriate, increased sharing of the pen could support a more united and representative Council in the near term. A more inclusive approach could help build the foundation for broader reform of Council membership while also addressing concerns voiced by elected members, as well as several peacekeeping host states.
Read the full article here.
Originally published in the Global Observatory.
International & Regional Organizations, International & Regional Organizations
On March 1, 2023, Mali submitted a letter to the Security Council president rejecting France as penholder on all issues concerning Mali, claiming France was responsible for “acts of aggression, violation of our airspace, subversion and destabilization.” Though Mali’s demand for a new penholder has not found support among the Council, this incident calls for a renewed look at the penholder system and may present an opportunity to promote greater inclusivity and unity in how the Council produces outcomes, particularly when it comes to context-specific matters.
Penholder diversification has become a noted topic of discussion in recent months, raised by the Security Council’s ten elected members (E10) in a joint statement at the 2022 Open Debate on Working Methods of the Security Council, and by Russia through the subsequent organization of an Arria-formula meeting on penholdership. While, for a number of reasons, a full overhaul of the penholder system would not be practical or appropriate, increased sharing of the pen could support a more united and representative Council in the near term. A more inclusive approach could help build the foundation for broader reform of Council membership while also addressing concerns voiced by elected members, as well as several peacekeeping host states.
Read the full article here.
Recent & Related
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Bombs, Bugs, and Bots: Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 25 Years After 9/11
The Shadow of 9/11 on Future US Foreign Policy
Can the Powers of the Post-9/11 Presidency Be Checked?
The Future of US Basing in the Gulf After the 2026 Iran War
The Continued Nuclear Security Legacy of 9/11
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.