Reality Check #2: Economic sanctions should not always be the go-to foreign policy tool

US policymakers should focus on whether sanctions are likely to produce the desired effect, rather than serving as simply a tool to signal displeasure.

By  Erica Borghard

Originally published by the Atlantic Council

For decades, policymakers have relied on economic sanctions (both their imposition and the prospect of their removal), as well as other types of economic statecraft, such as export controls and restrictions on foreign investments. While sanctions have more obvious coercive purposes, a broad range of economic instruments could be aimed at other states in order to change their behavior. However, the use (and overuse) of economic instruments for coercive and signaling purposes may be strategically unsound—not only because it often does not work, but also because of the long-term consequences.

Read the full piece on the Atlantic Council site.

Recent & Related

Policy Memo
Mathew Burrows • Robert A. Manning
Policy Memo
Chris O. Ògúnmọ́dẹdé

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea