Assumption Testing: Revisionist states are the cause of great-power competition

Assumption #1

Though these states are presumed to be creating a dangerous new era of great-power competition, it is an assumption with remarkably limited evidence to back it up.

Originally published by the Atlantic Council.

Download

The complete version of this item is available as a download.

The United States should intensify efforts to understand the scope of ambition of other states (particularly China and Russia), including increased peer-to-peer contact between governments, and at the Track Two level, as well as increased intelligence funding. The Biden administration should focus less on forward deployment and more on defensive contingencies; wherever possible, rely on partner and allied forces, rather than US troops, for forward presence. It should engage in reassurance measures with China and Russia; draw from the lessons of the Cold War to develop joint confidence-building measures (CBMs) with peer adversaries. Policymakers should initiate a policy process designed to more clearly define key US priorities and red lines, and to explore places where mutually acceptable revision of international institutions or norms might reduce tensions and defuse future conflicts.

Read the full publication at the Atlantic Council.

Recent & Related

Policy Memo
Mathew Burrows • Robert A. Manning
Policy Memo
Chris O. Ògúnmọ́dẹdé

Subscription Options

* indicates required

Research Areas

Pivotal Places

Publications & Project Lists

38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea