Stimson in the News

Stimson study on communications between intelligence agencies and media cited in the Washington Post

in Program

Clapper’s gag order could hurt intelligence analysts more
than journalists

The recent directive from Director of National Intelligence James R.
Clapper Jr. essentially banning contacts between members of the intelligence
community
and the media has been criticized for undermining the public
access to that community’s thinking and its role in society. However, it has
another, and perhaps far more dangerous consequence: its negative impact on
intelligence gathering and analysis.

-snip-

The Clapper directive ignores what we have learned from
recent experiences. The first of these were the misleading reports on Iraqi
weapons of mass destruction. The most generous reading of the commission report investigating these
shortcomings
would be that the intelligence community was afflicted by a
general lack of imagination. Second is the Arab Spring. A Stimson Center report demonstrated that
among all the observers – government officials, intelligence officers,
academics, think tank and NGO members, journalists – it was the journalists who
came closest to accurately predicting the momentous events that upended so many
regimes in the Middle East. One can also add predictions on the endurance of
Syria’s Bashar al-Assad. When many governments, including the Obama
administration, were hinting that Assad had six months at most, some lonely
voices in academia knew Syria well enough to see that this would not be the
case.

To read the full story, click here.

 

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Media Inquiries

Contact Caitlin Goodman at [email protected] or 202-478-3437.

Our main line is  202-223-5956.

Choose Your Subscription Topics
* indicates required
I'm interested in...
38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea
South Asian Voices