On 17 July 2014, Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 crashed while flying over eastern Ukraine. While the specific details of the crash remain unclear, it is believed that the commercial airliner was struck by a surface-to-air antiaircraft missile of Russian origin, presumably fired by pro-Russian separatists in the conflict-stricken area near Donetsk. While the tragedy represents a considerable escalation in violence and casualties resulting from the conflict, it also highlights the fatal effects that can stem from irresponsible arms transfers.
The Malaysian Airlines disaster also exemplifies the complexities of the international trade in conventional weapons. In today’s globalized environment, weapons are more accessible to a large number of different actors, through both legitimate and illegitimate means. Conventional arms include weapons used lawfully by national governments for national defense and security, by police, for sport and hunting activities, and even for personal security. As such, conventional arms, unlike nuclear weapons, are legitimately traded commodities on open markets.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Rachel Stohl and Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: isafmedia via flickr
Human Security & Governance, Human Security & Governance
On 17 July 2014, Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 crashed while flying over eastern Ukraine. While the specific details of the crash remain unclear, it is believed that the commercial airliner was struck by a surface-to-air antiaircraft missile of Russian origin, presumably fired by pro-Russian separatists in the conflict-stricken area near Donetsk. While the tragedy represents a considerable escalation in violence and casualties resulting from the conflict, it also highlights the fatal effects that can stem from irresponsible arms transfers.
The Malaysian Airlines disaster also exemplifies the complexities of the international trade in conventional weapons. In today’s globalized environment, weapons are more accessible to a large number of different actors, through both legitimate and illegitimate means. Conventional arms include weapons used lawfully by national governments for national defense and security, by police, for sport and hunting activities, and even for personal security. As such, conventional arms, unlike nuclear weapons, are legitimately traded commodities on open markets.
To continue reading click here.
Follow Rachel Stohl and Stimson on Twitter
Photo credit: isafmedia via flickr
Recent & Related
Intergenerational Solidarity and Learning in an Era of Declining Trust
The UN Annually Votes on Ending the US Embargo on Cuba. What Does it Mean for Unilateral Sanctions and Their Impact on Human Rights?
Experts React: The Midterms and America’s Place in the World
The Lame-Duck Period is Full of Peril in the War on Iran
Is Reforming the UNSC Realistic? Article 27(3) of the UN Charter Offers a Starting Point.
Beyond the Populist Zeitgeist
A New Transatlantic Equilibrium
Forging a European Foreign Policy
A Superpower in Decline
What Is Going on in Cybersecurity?
The Implications of Ukraine’s Starshield Access for the US Military
Egypt’s Parallel Inc. & the Myth of Sovereign Efficiency
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.