This Op-Ed was originally published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies Pacific Forum
By Yuki Tatsumi – On October 3, the United States and Japan held the Security Consultative Committee (SCC) meeting, often referred to as “two-plus-two” because it includes the US secretaries of state and defense and Japan’s foreign and defense ministers, in Tokyo. The joint statement issued at the end of the meeting, “Toward a More Robust Alliance and Greater Shared Responsibilities”, described the vision of the US-Japan alliance that is “more balanced and effective.” It included an extensive list of action items in three categories: “bilateral security and defense cooperation” (previously called “roles, missions, and capabilities”), “regional engagement,” and “US force realignment in Japan”.
While this joint statement is encouraging in that it reaffirms the two countries’ commitment to further enhance the resilience of the US-Japan alliance, its ambitious agenda raises a simple question: can Washington and Tokyo muster the political capital necessary to move forward with the action items in the document?
A future vision for the Alliance
The joint statement is important for several reasons. First, the document reaffirmed the role of the US-Japan alliance as “the cornerstone of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region”. It builds on the work done in previous SCC joint statements – “Toward a Deeper and Broader Alliance: Building on 50 Years of Partnership” issued in June 2011 and the joint statement adopted in April 2012 – when Japan was led by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ).
To read the full article, click here.
Photo credit: DOD photo, Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo
Japan
This Op-Ed was originally published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies Pacific Forum
By Yuki Tatsumi – On October 3, the United States and Japan held the Security Consultative Committee (SCC) meeting, often referred to as “two-plus-two” because it includes the US secretaries of state and defense and Japan’s foreign and defense ministers, in Tokyo. The joint statement issued at the end of the meeting, “Toward a More Robust Alliance and Greater Shared Responsibilities”, described the vision of the US-Japan alliance that is “more balanced and effective.” It included an extensive list of action items in three categories: “bilateral security and defense cooperation” (previously called “roles, missions, and capabilities”), “regional engagement,” and “US force realignment in Japan”.
While this joint statement is encouraging in that it reaffirms the two countries’ commitment to further enhance the resilience of the US-Japan alliance, its ambitious agenda raises a simple question: can Washington and Tokyo muster the political capital necessary to move forward with the action items in the document?
A future vision for the Alliance
The joint statement is important for several reasons. First, the document reaffirmed the role of the US-Japan alliance as “the cornerstone of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region”. It builds on the work done in previous SCC joint statements – “Toward a Deeper and Broader Alliance: Building on 50 Years of Partnership” issued in June 2011 and the joint statement adopted in April 2012 – when Japan was led by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ).
To read the full article, click here.
Photo credit: DOD photo, Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.