Illicit trade in weapons, narcotics, counterfeit goods and much more has found many seams where even the most well-resourced law enforcement and intelligence efforts don’t suffice. While global flows of goods and information have brought great prosperity, they have also exposed serious weaknesses in traditional tools of governance.
In most cases, the people and organizations profiting from cross-border crimes hide in plain sight, co-opting the same global infrastructure for trade and communication that underpins legitimate commerce. And they are undiscriminating in the damage they inflict, from sapping tax revenues, to erasing the competitive advantages of legitimate companies, to outfitting terrorists with weapons and creating more widespread instability.
All this begs the question: Are companies responsible for promoting national security, beyond complying with the law?
Things might get worse before they get better. Access to sophisticated technologies will continue to widen, black markets will persist and bad guys will continue to exploit both. Not even the United States will be able to keep these challenges at bay using traditional tools alone. As President Jed Bartlet of West Wing lore once mused, “You really gotta ask yourself, what’s the point in being a superpower anymore.”
To read the full op-ed, click here.
_______________________________
This op-ed was first published in Ideas Lab on Oct. 31, 2013
Photo by Official U.S. Air Force via flickr
Human Security & Governance, Human Security & Governance
Illicit trade in weapons, narcotics, counterfeit goods and much more has found many seams where even the most well-resourced law enforcement and intelligence efforts don’t suffice. While global flows of goods and information have brought great prosperity, they have also exposed serious weaknesses in traditional tools of governance.
In most cases, the people and organizations profiting from cross-border crimes hide in plain sight, co-opting the same global infrastructure for trade and communication that underpins legitimate commerce. And they are undiscriminating in the damage they inflict, from sapping tax revenues, to erasing the competitive advantages of legitimate companies, to outfitting terrorists with weapons and creating more widespread instability.
All this begs the question: Are companies responsible for promoting national security, beyond complying with the law?
Things might get worse before they get better. Access to sophisticated technologies will continue to widen, black markets will persist and bad guys will continue to exploit both. Not even the United States will be able to keep these challenges at bay using traditional tools alone. As President Jed Bartlet of West Wing lore once mused, “You really gotta ask yourself, what’s the point in being a superpower anymore.”
To read the full op-ed, click here.
_______________________________
This op-ed was first published in Ideas Lab on Oct. 31, 2013
Photo by Official U.S. Air Force via flickr
Recent & Related
Made in the Gulf, Designed in America: How the Iran War Has Incentivized Drone Production in the GCC
The Orphan of the Summit of the Future: The Declaration on Future Generations
Experts React: Takeaways from the Trump-Xi Summit
Kabuki Diplomacy Between US and Iran at UNGA
Is the Iran War Worth It? Six Months Later, Still No
Why Iran-Backed Iraqi Armed Groups Are Hedging on Disarmament
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.