The Challenge: As global energy demands grow in parallel with concerns over climate change and energy security, States are looking to nuclear power to satisfy their baseload electricity needs and reduce their reliance on carbon fuels. Given the increasing terrorism threat and the potentially high consequences from nuclear incidents, comprehensive security measures are especially important for this critical infrastructure. However, operators are faced with implementing complex and sometimes conflicting guidelines for security and safety developed with limited industry input. In addition, international oversight mechanisms are insufficient, and national oversight through domestic nuclear regulators is challenged by differing levels of experience and conflicting cultural norms.
An Opportunity: After the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit, a framework will be needed to sustain momentum toward improved nuclear security. The imperatives for nuclear security and safety already exist in treaties, conventions, and UN Security Council resolutions; however, the details of how to implement the agreements often pose dilemmas. With the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material likely to enter into force in 2016, and States looking for guidance on complying with its principles, the global community now has an opportunity to support a new framework of multistakeholder engagement to develop voluntary performance standards and to include industry in their development. Such standards could be used to demonstrate compliance with internationally agreed-upon principles. Financial and nonfinancial incentives could be structured to motivate voluntary compliance with these standards so that security can become a valuable commodity instead of an add-on cost. A real public-private partnership for nuclear security can be established.
To hear speakers at the report launch, click here.
Nonproliferation
The Challenge: As global energy demands grow in parallel with concerns over climate change and energy security, States are looking to nuclear power to satisfy their baseload electricity needs and reduce their reliance on carbon fuels. Given the increasing terrorism threat and the potentially high consequences from nuclear incidents, comprehensive security measures are especially important for this critical infrastructure. However, operators are faced with implementing complex and sometimes conflicting guidelines for security and safety developed with limited industry input. In addition, international oversight mechanisms are insufficient, and national oversight through domestic nuclear regulators is challenged by differing levels of experience and conflicting cultural norms.
An Opportunity: After the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit, a framework will be needed to sustain momentum toward improved nuclear security. The imperatives for nuclear security and safety already exist in treaties, conventions, and UN Security Council resolutions; however, the details of how to implement the agreements often pose dilemmas. With the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material likely to enter into force in 2016, and States looking for guidance on complying with its principles, the global community now has an opportunity to support a new framework of multistakeholder engagement to develop voluntary performance standards and to include industry in their development. Such standards could be used to demonstrate compliance with internationally agreed-upon principles. Financial and nonfinancial incentives could be structured to motivate voluntary compliance with these standards so that security can become a valuable commodity instead of an add-on cost. A real public-private partnership for nuclear security can be established.
To hear speakers at the report launch, click here.
Recent & Related
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Future of International Cooperation Report 2026
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Bombs, Bugs, and Bots: Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 25 Years After 9/11
The Shadow of 9/11 on Future US Foreign Policy
Can the Powers of the Post-9/11 Presidency Be Checked?
The Future of US Basing in the Gulf After the 2026 Iran War
The Continued Nuclear Security Legacy of 9/11
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.