By Eli Enos and Rachel Stohl
Less than a month after President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and praised members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), sent a letter to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stating his intention to halt new sales of lethal military equipment to the Gulf until the dispute in the region is resolved. This withholding of new clearances for arms to the region could have far-reaching effects on countries like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Qatar, all of which have arms deals in the U.S. pipeline.
Corker’s surprising letter comes after the June actions by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates, who cut diplomatic, economic, and political ties with Qatar for its alleged support of terrorism. As internal divisions within the Trump administration over which side to support have undermined U.S. efforts to mediate the crisis, Senator Corker’s maneuver may be an attempt to put additional outside pressure on the Gulf countries to find a solution. State Department officials have publicly questioned the details of the claims made toward Qatar, and Qatar has thus far rejected the demands of its GCC partners as unreasonable.

Click here for further information
For Qatar, there is a lot at stake with this potential halt in new approvals. The United States and Qatar have enjoyed a lucrative and extensive defense relationship for 25 years. Following the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991, the two countries signed a defense cooperation agreement (DCA), renewed in 2013, which governs the U.S. training of Qatar’s military, its forward deployment of military equipment, and permission for the United States to operate out of Al Udeid airbase. As the largest U.S. air base in the region, Al Udeid is home to roughly 11,000 U.S. personnel and CENTCOM’s Combat Air Operations Center. It serves as the nerve center for all U.S. operations in the Middle East and remains essential in supporting U.S. and coalition combat operations in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan.
Since 2001, Qatar has spent more than $9 billion on U.S. arms and $1 billion on base construction. Purchases of U.S. weapons systems — including Apache attack helicopters, Javelin missiles, and missile defense systems — follow a regional trend towards advanced U.S. systems and cut into French domination of the Qatari arms market. Should the $12.1 billion F-15 deal signed earlier this month go through, it would mark Qatar’s largest purchase of U.S. arms to date. With the second smallest standing military in the Gulf, the addition of dozens of new aircraft would vastly expand Qatar’s current fleet and its ability to conduct operations in the region.
Despite the current crisis within the GCC and recent White House rhetoric, Qatar saw the recent F-15 agreement as a sign of continued U.S. commitment to their security relationship. The temporary halt to new approvals probably won’t impact arms sales in the long run, but it may give Qatar an additional level of uncertainty as it navigates the current regional stalemate.
___
Eli Enos is a Program Assistant for — and Rachel Stohl is Director of — the Conventional Defense Program at the Stimson Center.
Additional Resources
Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) Reports:
https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/reports/655_intro.html
Excess Defense Articles (EDA) FY 2001 – FY 2018:
https://www.dsca.mil/programs/excess-defense-articles-eda
Foreign Military Financing (FMF):
2001-2005 Actual: https://www.state.gov/s/d/rm/rls/cbj/
2006 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/84462.pdf
2007 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/101447.pdf
2008 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/124295.pdf
2009 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/138174.pdf
2010 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/158269.pdf
2011 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/185016.pdf
2012 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208292.pdf
2013 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/222898.pdf
2014 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236395.pdf
2015 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/252179.pdf
2016 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2017 Estimate: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2018 Request: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
Foreign Military Sales (FMS):
https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
Foreign Military Construction Sales (FMCS):
https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
International Military Education & Training (IMET):
2001 – 2015 Actual: https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
2016 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2017 Estimate: https://www.congress.gov/114/crpt/srpt290/CRPT-114srpt290.pdf
2018 Request: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
Conventional Arms
Share:
By Eli Enos and Rachel Stohl
Less than a month after President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and praised members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), sent a letter to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stating his intention to halt new sales of lethal military equipment to the Gulf until the dispute in the region is resolved. This withholding of new clearances for arms to the region could have far-reaching effects on countries like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Qatar, all of which have arms deals in the U.S. pipeline.
Corker’s surprising letter comes after the June actions by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates, who cut diplomatic, economic, and political ties with Qatar for its alleged support of terrorism. As internal divisions within the Trump administration over which side to support have undermined U.S. efforts to mediate the crisis, Senator Corker’s maneuver may be an attempt to put additional outside pressure on the Gulf countries to find a solution. State Department officials have publicly questioned the details of the claims made toward Qatar, and Qatar has thus far rejected the demands of its GCC partners as unreasonable.
Click here for further information
For Qatar, there is a lot at stake with this potential halt in new approvals. The United States and Qatar have enjoyed a lucrative and extensive defense relationship for 25 years. Following the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991, the two countries signed a defense cooperation agreement (DCA), renewed in 2013, which governs the U.S. training of Qatar’s military, its forward deployment of military equipment, and permission for the United States to operate out of Al Udeid airbase. As the largest U.S. air base in the region, Al Udeid is home to roughly 11,000 U.S. personnel and CENTCOM’s Combat Air Operations Center. It serves as the nerve center for all U.S. operations in the Middle East and remains essential in supporting U.S. and coalition combat operations in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan.
Since 2001, Qatar has spent more than $9 billion on U.S. arms and $1 billion on base construction. Purchases of U.S. weapons systems — including Apache attack helicopters, Javelin missiles, and missile defense systems — follow a regional trend towards advanced U.S. systems and cut into French domination of the Qatari arms market. Should the $12.1 billion F-15 deal signed earlier this month go through, it would mark Qatar’s largest purchase of U.S. arms to date. With the second smallest standing military in the Gulf, the addition of dozens of new aircraft would vastly expand Qatar’s current fleet and its ability to conduct operations in the region.
Despite the current crisis within the GCC and recent White House rhetoric, Qatar saw the recent F-15 agreement as a sign of continued U.S. commitment to their security relationship. The temporary halt to new approvals probably won’t impact arms sales in the long run, but it may give Qatar an additional level of uncertainty as it navigates the current regional stalemate.
___
Eli Enos is a Program Assistant for — and Rachel Stohl is Director of — the Conventional Defense Program at the Stimson Center.
Additional Resources
Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) Reports:
https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/reports/655_intro.html
Excess Defense Articles (EDA) FY 2001 – FY 2018:
https://www.dsca.mil/programs/excess-defense-articles-eda
Foreign Military Financing (FMF):
2001-2005 Actual: https://www.state.gov/s/d/rm/rls/cbj/
2006 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/84462.pdf
2007 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/101447.pdf
2008 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/124295.pdf
2009 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/138174.pdf
2010 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/158269.pdf
2011 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/185016.pdf
2012 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208292.pdf
2013 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/222898.pdf
2014 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236395.pdf
2015 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/252179.pdf
2016 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2017 Estimate: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2018 Request: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
Foreign Military Sales (FMS):
https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
Foreign Military Construction Sales (FMCS):
https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
International Military Education & Training (IMET):
2001 – 2015 Actual: https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/historical_facts_book_-_30_september_2015.pdf
2016 Actual: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
2017 Estimate: https://www.congress.gov/114/crpt/srpt290/CRPT-114srpt290.pdf
2018 Request: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271013.pdf
Photo credit John Murphy
Recent & Related
Iran Uses Diplomacy and Coercion to Perpetuate Control of the Strait of Hormuz
From ‘Three Amigos’ to Distrustful Neighbors
Community Adaptation for a Water Festival Without Clean Water
Tripoli’s New Leverage: How the American Initiative Changed the Rules of Negotiation
America’s Chip Future Still Runs Through Taiwan
Postwar, Iran Is at a Crossroads
When Formal Alliances Stop Doing Political Work: The Canada-US Alliance in Crisis
Post-War Street Rallies in Iran: The Ascendance of Religious over National Identity
The Next Iran Nuclear Deal: Lessons from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and North Korea
The Negative Strategic Consequences of the US-Iran War for Iraq
What OCHA’s 87 Million Lives Campaign Reveals About the Future of UN Leadership
What The Iran War Reveals About Airpower
What Demographic Trends Mean for US Policy
Community Adaptation for a Water Festival Without Clean Water
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
Trump–Xi Summit: Expert Perspectives on the Stakes and Strategic Outlook
Breaking Silos to Beat Scams: Why Holistic Law Enforcement Matters
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.