The Challenge: As global energy demands grow in parallel with concerns over climate change and energy security, States are looking to nuclear power to satisfy their baseload electricity needs and reduce their reliance on carbon fuels. Given the increasing terrorism threat and the potentially high consequences from nuclear incidents, comprehensive security measures are especially important for this critical infrastructure. However, operators are faced with implementing complex and sometimes conflicting guidelines for security and safety developed with limited industry input. In addition, international oversight mechanisms are insufficient, and national oversight through domestic nuclear regulators is challenged by differing levels of experience and conflicting cultural norms.
An Opportunity: After the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit, a framework will be needed to sustain momentum toward improved nuclear security. The imperatives for nuclear security and safety already exist in treaties, conventions, and UN Security Council resolutions; however, the details of how to implement the agreements often pose dilemmas. With the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material likely to enter into force in 2016, and States looking for guidance on complying with its principles, the global community now has an opportunity to support a new framework of multistakeholder engagement to develop voluntary performance standards and to include industry in their development. Such standards could be used to demonstrate compliance with internationally agreed-upon principles. Financial and nonfinancial incentives could be structured to motivate voluntary compliance with these standards so that security can become a valuable commodity instead of an add-on cost. A real public-private partnership for nuclear security can be established.
To hear speakers at the report launch, click here.
Nonproliferation
Share:
The Challenge: As global energy demands grow in parallel with concerns over climate change and energy security, States are looking to nuclear power to satisfy their baseload electricity needs and reduce their reliance on carbon fuels. Given the increasing terrorism threat and the potentially high consequences from nuclear incidents, comprehensive security measures are especially important for this critical infrastructure. However, operators are faced with implementing complex and sometimes conflicting guidelines for security and safety developed with limited industry input. In addition, international oversight mechanisms are insufficient, and national oversight through domestic nuclear regulators is challenged by differing levels of experience and conflicting cultural norms.
An Opportunity: After the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit, a framework will be needed to sustain momentum toward improved nuclear security. The imperatives for nuclear security and safety already exist in treaties, conventions, and UN Security Council resolutions; however, the details of how to implement the agreements often pose dilemmas. With the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material likely to enter into force in 2016, and States looking for guidance on complying with its principles, the global community now has an opportunity to support a new framework of multistakeholder engagement to develop voluntary performance standards and to include industry in their development. Such standards could be used to demonstrate compliance with internationally agreed-upon principles. Financial and nonfinancial incentives could be structured to motivate voluntary compliance with these standards so that security can become a valuable commodity instead of an add-on cost. A real public-private partnership for nuclear security can be established.
To hear speakers at the report launch, click here.
Recent & Related
The Accountability Gap – Tackling Cyber Fraud Across Legal Frameworks
Iran Uses Diplomacy and Coercion to Perpetuate Control of the Strait of Hormuz
From ‘Three Amigos’ to Distrustful Neighbors
Community Adaptation for a Water Festival Without Clean Water
Tripoli’s New Leverage: How the American Initiative Changed the Rules of Negotiation
America’s Chip Future Still Runs Through Taiwan
Postwar, Iran Is at a Crossroads
When Formal Alliances Stop Doing Political Work: The Canada-US Alliance in Crisis
Post-War Street Rallies in Iran: The Ascendance of Religious over National Identity
The Next Iran Nuclear Deal: Lessons from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and North Korea
The Negative Strategic Consequences of the US-Iran War for Iraq
What OCHA’s 87 Million Lives Campaign Reveals About the Future of UN Leadership
What Demographic Trends Mean for US Policy
Community Adaptation for a Water Festival Without Clean Water
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
Trump–Xi Summit: Expert Perspectives on the Stakes and Strategic Outlook
Breaking Silos to Beat Scams: Why Holistic Law Enforcement Matters
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.