The United States should lead an allied cruise missile attack against Syria if evidence of the Syrian government’s culpability is conclusive. The costs of inaction outweigh the significant risks of military intervention. Yet, U.S. policy makers should also expect that a military response likely will extinguish any hope for U.S.-Russian cooperation on Syria-at least in the short term.
A staunch ally of Damascus, Russia has consistently sought to protect Syria from international intervention. In this latest and most serious episode of alleged chemical weapons use, the Russians have suggested Syrian rebels perpetrated the attack as a pretext for military strikes. With a U.S.-led attack appearing increasingly likely, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has warned against military intervention, deeming a potential attack “catastrophic” and a “serious violation of international law.”
To read the full piece, click here.
______________________________________________
This originally was published in the New York Times on August 26, 2013
Photo credit: Defence Images via flickr
Middle East, North Africa
The United States should lead an allied cruise missile attack against Syria if evidence of the Syrian government’s culpability is conclusive. The costs of inaction outweigh the significant risks of military intervention. Yet, U.S. policy makers should also expect that a military response likely will extinguish any hope for U.S.-Russian cooperation on Syria-at least in the short term.
A staunch ally of Damascus, Russia has consistently sought to protect Syria from international intervention. In this latest and most serious episode of alleged chemical weapons use, the Russians have suggested Syrian rebels perpetrated the attack as a pretext for military strikes. With a U.S.-led attack appearing increasingly likely, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has warned against military intervention, deeming a potential attack “catastrophic” and a “serious violation of international law.”
To read the full piece, click here.
______________________________________________
This originally was published in the New York Times on August 26, 2013
Photo credit: Defence Images via flickr
Recent & Related
9 Issues to Watch at UNGA 81
Why the Houthi Capture of Mocha Matters Far Beyond Yemen
Nuclear Disruption: The US-Saudi 123 Agreement and the Future of Nuclear Cooperation in the Middle East
The Nation Is Not Alone. We Need Reflexive Multilateralism
“No, History Begins Today”: Why Washington Could Not Reshape Pakistan’s Interests After 9/11
What if the US Had Made Peace With Iran After 9/11?
Bombs, Bugs, and Bots: Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 25 Years After 9/11
The Shadow of 9/11 on Future US Foreign Policy
Can the Powers of the Post-9/11 Presidency Be Checked?
The Future of US Basing in the Gulf After the 2026 Iran War
The Continued Nuclear Security Legacy of 9/11
A Cascading Disaster on the China–Nepal Border: What to Know About the August 2026 Rasuwa Flood, 72 Hours Later
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.