US Foreign Policy
Project

Military Coercion and US Foreign Policy

The Use of Force Short of War
New book about the use of the U.S. military force as a coercive instrument, using historical and quantitative analysis of U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War era (1991-2018)
Project Info

Since the end of the Cold War the US military has conducted hundreds of combat operations, exercises, and shows of force short of war to advance American interests and persuade adversaries to meet its demands. Military Coercion and US Foreign Policy: The Use of Force Short of War, examines how the US has used its military as a tool of influence, deterrence, and coercive diplomacy to achieve US policy goals. It shows that US efforts to coerce other countries fail as often as they succeed and calls into question many longstanding assumptions about military threats.

Military Coercion and US Foreign Policy uses statistical analyses and historical case studies based on a new dataset of more than 100 cases (1991-2018) to give policymakers and practitioners new insights to help improve their odds of success.

Military Coercion and US Foreign Policy (Routledge 2020) features case studies by renowned experts such as Kenneth Pollack (AEI), Thomas Wright (Brookings), and Bill Durch (Stimson). The book builds upon the pioneering work of Barry Blechman and Stephen Kaplan in Force Without War: US Armed Forces as a Political Instrument (Brookings 1978) in attempting to better understand how applications of military force, short of war, can help achieve foreign policy objectives.

In the News
  • Op-Ed ·

Mattis is poisoning the well on women in combat

Secretary of Defense James Mattis is against women in combat. He made this clear in his 2017 confirmation hearings, in comments given on Tuesday at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI), whose student body is 89…
  • Op-Ed ·

NATO Isn’t Cheap—and It’s Still Worth the Price

President Trump’s confounding behavior during the recent meeting with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members and at this week’s Helsinki summit with Russia has produced no shortage of dismay among…
  • Op-Ed ·

How Postponing a Wargame Helped Create a Diplomatic Opening

Delaying Foal Eagle 2018 made an underappreciated contribution toward the first meeting of U.S. and North Korean heads of state. U.S. and South Korean officials credit the U.S. strategy of maximum pressure and “zero concessions”…
Choose Your Subscription Topics
* indicates required
I'm interested in...
38 North: News and Analysis on North Korea
South Asian Voices