Unblocking the Road to Zero: Pakistan and Israel
May 06, 2009
Two Tough Cases: Persuading Israel and Pakistan to Relinquish Nuclear Weapons
US President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev have jointly pledged to renew talks for a treaty to reduce their nuclear arsenals with the ultimate goal of achieving a world free of nuclear weapons. As the two largest nuclear powers, it is incumbent that these nations take the first steps. Eventually, however, the other seven countries that possess nuclear weapons will have to be persuaded to join the disarmament process.
The two toughest are likely to be Pakistan and Israel. These two relatively small countries have a shared, but otherwise unique, perspective on their nuclear capabilities. They see them as not only deterring the use of nuclear weapons by other nations, as do the other nuclear powers, but also as offsetting the greater resources and therefore actual or potential superior conventional military capabilities of adversaries - enemies with whom they have fought wars in the past. Consequently, they will be reluctant to give up their nuclear weapons solely in exchange for the nuclear weapons of others.
Israel and Pakistan are addressed in the third volume of the Stimson series on the perspectives of advanced nuclear countries on nuclear weapons and nuclear disarmament, edited by Stimson co-founder and Distinguished Fellow Barry Blechman. The paper on Israel is written by Brigadier General Shlomo Brom (Retired); Pakistan is by Brigadier General Feroz Khan (Retired). The two papers make clear that dedicated US leadership would be required to lead these countries to nuclear disarmament negotiations but that, in addition, specific steps would have to be taken to reduce the broader threats perceived by Israel and Pakistan, giving them the confidence to join the other nuclear-armed countries in multilateral reductions. Of the two, Israel probably poses the greater challenge.
In partnership with the World Security Institute, Stimson's project on nuclear security seeks to examine the obstacles blocking the path to zero nuclear weapons in order to help all responsible governments perceive negotiated nuclear disarmament as a viable and practical policy option.
This relates to…
March 19, 2010
National Perspectives on Nuclear Disarmament
National Perspectives on Nuclear Disarmament compiles Unblocking the Road to Zero's previous country monographs into a single, accessible volume. Renowned experts discuss the views of
… Read More »
January 22, 2010
Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty
Elements of a Nuclear Disarmament Treaty is a comprehensive analysis of the technical measures required to achieve and sustain a world without nuclear weapons.
Topics in this
… Read More »
May 09, 2009
Unblocking the Road to Zero: Brazil, Japan, Turkey
The Role of Non-Weapon States in Nuclear Disarmament
The elimination of nuclear weapons is not only a task for countries with nuclear weapons - it cannot be accomplished without key
… Read More »
May 08, 2009
Unblocking the Road to Zero: US and Russia
Can US-Russian nuclear reductions go low enough to make a nuclear weapon-free world possible?
On July 6th, the Kremlin and the White House announced that they would be negotiating a
… Read More »
May 07, 2009
Unblocking the Road to Zero: North Korea and Iran
Delaying Zero: How can Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs be stopped and even reversed?
Against the backdrop of North Korea's nuclear test on May 25th and subsequent missile
… Read More »
May 05, 2009
Unblocking the Road to Zero: China and India
As rising powers in Asia and the world, both China and India are advancing technologically and gaining influence in global economic and political affairs. They are each modernizing
… Read More »
May 04, 2009
Unblocking the Road to Zero: France and the UK
Published together in this volume, the first two papers in the series cover America's allies: France and the UK. Noted nuclear strategist Sir Lawrence Freedman examines how British
… Read More »
